Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 7;11(4):e0005508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005508

Table 3. Comparative results for test positive on RBT, LFA, SAT and Coombs.

Sera RBT 1a RBT 2a LFA (IgM) SAT Coombs (IgG) FBAT ‘A’ FBAT ‘M’
1 + + - 1:40 1:160 1:160 1:160
2 + + + 1:20 1:20 1:160 1:160
3 + - - 1:80–160 1:160 1:320 1:160
4 + + - 1:20 1:20 1:160 1:80
5 + - + <1:20 <1:20 1:20 <1:20
6 + + - 1:20 1:40 1:40 1:80
7 - + - <1:20 1:640 1:160 1:160
8 - + - 1:20 1:20 1:80 <1:20
9 - - + nd nd 1:160 1:80
10 - - + nd nd 1:80 1:160
11 - - + nd nd 1:40 1:20
12 - - - 1:20 1:320 1:40 1:40

a RBT 1 was performed in health facilities in Kenya; RBT 2 was performed at the University of Navarra.