Table 3. Comparative results for test positive on RBT, LFA, SAT and Coombs.
Sera | RBT 1a | RBT 2a | LFA (IgM) | SAT | Coombs (IgG) | FBAT ‘A’ | FBAT ‘M’ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | + | + | - | 1:40 | 1:160 | 1:160 | 1:160 |
2 | + | + | + | 1:20 | 1:20 | 1:160 | 1:160 |
3 | + | - | - | 1:80–160 | 1:160 | 1:320 | 1:160 |
4 | + | + | - | 1:20 | 1:20 | 1:160 | 1:80 |
5 | + | - | + | <1:20 | <1:20 | 1:20 | <1:20 |
6 | + | + | - | 1:20 | 1:40 | 1:40 | 1:80 |
7 | - | + | - | <1:20 | 1:640 | 1:160 | 1:160 |
8 | - | + | - | 1:20 | 1:20 | 1:80 | <1:20 |
9 | - | - | + | nd | nd | 1:160 | 1:80 |
10 | - | - | + | nd | nd | 1:80 | 1:160 |
11 | - | - | + | nd | nd | 1:40 | 1:20 |
12 | - | - | - | 1:20 | 1:320 | 1:40 | 1:40 |
a RBT 1 was performed in health facilities in Kenya; RBT 2 was performed at the University of Navarra.