Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 28;23(16):2832–2840. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i16.2832

Table 2.

Summary of the feasibility studies on elastography in animal models

Ref. Subjects Results
Kim et al[11], 2008 Animal model (rats) Technique Strain difference of normal colon vs affected left colon P < 0.0002
6 Left-sided chronic colitides (from TNBS) Strain elastography (UEI)
5 controls Comparison Significant correlation between Young’s modulus and strain r = 0.67, P < 0.0005
Direct mechanical measurement, Histology
Stidham et al[10], 2011 Animal model (TNBS rats) Technique Strain values:
5 acute colitides Strain elastography (UEI) controls vs acute inflammation P = 0.015,
5 chronic fibrosis Comparison controls vs chronic fibrosis P = 0.001,
5 controls Histology acute inflammation vs chronic fibrosis P = 0.037
Strain ratio:
acute inflammation vs chronic fibrosis P = 0.030
Dillman et al[45], 2013 Animal model Technique SW velocity ratio:
6 acute colitides Shear wave elastography (Shear wave speed imaging) AUROC curve for differentiating fibrosis from inflammation 0.971
8 chronic colitides/fibrosis
3 controls Comparison
Histology

TNBS: Trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid; UEI: Ultrasound elasticity imaging; CD: Crohn’s disease; AUROC: Area under receiver operating characteristic; SW: Shear wave; VAS: Visual analogue scale.