Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 29;33(2):337–346. doi: 10.1002/btpr.2459

Table 2.

Comparison of Models Developed with the Fluorescence EEM Using Three Different Model Building Techniques: Unfolded‐PLS, NPLS, and PARAFAC‐PLS.

Model building method Latent variables RMSEC (g·L−1) RMSECV (g·L−1)
RC2
R2CV
Lactate concentration
Unfolded PLS 9 0.65 1.06 0.975 0.935
NPLS 6 1.81 2.01 0.808 0.770
PARAFAC 3 component/PLS 3 2.82 2.91 0.533 0.502
PARAFAC 4 component/PLS 4 2.80 2.95 0.538 0.490
Glucose concentration
Unfolded PLS 4 1.36 1.53 0.560 0.442
NPLS 5 1.34 1.43 0.572 0.513
PARAFAC 3 component/PLS 2 1.86 1.91 0.166 0.130
PARAFAC 4 components/PLS 4 1.80 1.92 0.220 0.133
Ammonium concentration
Unfolded PLS 9 0.021 0.031 0.960 0.917
NPLS 6 0.041 0.054 0.850 0.748
PARAFAC 3 component/PLS 3 0.084 0.086 0.367 0.342
PARAFAC 4 components/PLS 3 0.082 0.084 0.391 0.363