Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 26;8:15193. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15193

Figure 3. Correlations between ICA2 weights, EM performance and cortical thickness score F6.

Figure 3

(a) Correlation between cortical thickness factor score F6 and ICA2 weights in the methylomic profiling sample. (b) Correlation between ICA2 weights and EM performance in the methylomic profiling sample. (c) Correlation between cortical thickness factor score F6 and EM performance in the combined sample (N=1,234). Subjects from the methylomic profiling sample are shown in blue. ICA2 and the EM/imaging phenotypes are adjusted for chronological age effects.