Skip to main content
. 2017 May 2;9:46. doi: 10.1186/s13148-017-0347-1

Table 3.

Clinical variables of interest and CIMP concordance status

Variable Metastasis − primary−
(n = 64)
Metastasis − primary+
(n = 1)
Metastasis + primary−
(n = 0)
Metastasis + primary+
(n = 5)
*P value
N % N % N % N %
Age 0.52
 Mean (range) 61.0 [24.2, 79.9] 74.4 [74.4, 74.4] 60.6 [51.1, 66.8]
 Missing 8 0 0 0
Sex 0.36
 Female 30 50% 1 100% 1 20%
 Male 30 50% 0 0 4 80%
 Missing 4 0 0 0
Stage at diagnosis >0.99
 I 0 0 0 0 0 0
 II 6 11% 0 0 0 0
 III 13 23% 0 0 1 20%
 IV 37 67% 1 100% 4 80%
 Missing 7 0 0 0
Primary site >0.99
 Right 12 21% 0 0 1 20%
 Left 45 79% 1 100% 4 80%
 Missing 7 0 0 0
Histological grade 0.21
 Grade 1–2 35 66% 1 100% 5 100%
 Grade 3 18 34% 0 0 0 0
 Missing 11 0 0 0
Mucinous features 0.10
 No 45 82% 1 100% 2 40%
 Yes 10 18% 0 0 3 60%
 Missing 9 0 0 0
Lymphovascular invasion >0.99
 No 38 72% 1 100% 4 80%
 Yes 15 28% 0 0 1 20%
 Missing 11 0 0 0
Perineural invasion >0.99
 No 40 71% 1 100% 4 80%
 Yes 12 21% 0 0 1 20%
 Not applicable 4 7% 0 0 0 0
 Missing 8 0 0 0
Molecular status, mutant
KRAS 22 37% 1 100% 0 1 20% 0.33
BRAF 2 3% 0 0 0 0 0 >0.99
NRAS 2 3% 0 0 0 0 0 >0.99
Mismatch repair status, deficienta 0 0 0 0 0 n/a

*P values for categorical variables calculated with a Fisher’s exact test. P values for continuous variables calculated with an ANOVA

aMismatch repair status was performed for cases with detected CIMP positivity in the primary and/or metastatic tissue