Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 27;8(4):3239–3248. doi: 10.1039/c6sc04343g

Table 2. Comparison of the permeability and selectivity for MMM from this work and other PIM-1-based MMMs from the literature.

Filler Loading (wt%) P CO2 /Barrer α (CO2/N2) Operational conditions Reference
MFM-300(VIII) 25 4450 28.04 287 K, 1 bar This work
MFM-300(VIII) 25 4617 21.28 303 K, 1 bar This work
ZIF-8 39 4270 21.89 295 K, 1 bar 45
PAF-1 30 3250 22 298 K, 1 bar 46
Ti5UIO-66 5 5340 24 298 K, 2 bar 47
CC3 30 5430 20 298 K, 1 bar 48
MFI 23.5 a 2530 30 298 K, 1 bar 49
TSIL@NH2-MIL-101(Cr) 5 2979 37.24 298 K, 3 bar 50

a Volumetric loading for this sample as v%.