Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr;220(2Part B):329–340. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.10.001

Table 4.

Sanitation structure and design characteristics and their associations with latrine use.

Main Factors Sub Factors Effect on Use Reference
Functionality & Maintenance
  • -

    Latrine functional

Barnard et al. (2013)
  • -

    Unbroken pan

Barnard et al. (2013)
  • -

    Covered pit

Barnard et al. (2013)
  • -

    Well maintained

Mathew et al. (2008), Roma et al. (2010)
  • -

    Susceptible to flooding

Caruso et al. (2014a)
  • -

    Susceptible to flooding

Caruso et al. (2014a)
  • -

    Poor structural integrity

Caruso et al. (2014a), Olsen et al. (2001), Pfadenhauer and Rehfuess (2015), Routray et al. (2015)
Hygiene Amenities
  • -

    Lack of anal cleansing materials

Drangert and Nawab (2011)
  • -

    Lack of menstrual hygiene materials

Freeman et al. (2013b)
Latrine type
  • -

    VIP (compared to unimproved)

Kema et al. (2012)
  • -

    Prefabricated plastic latrine (compared to pit)

Garn et al. (2014)
  • -

    Pour-flush latrine with large pit size

Coffey et al. (2014)
Accessibility
  • -

    Latrines not present

Caruso et al. (2014a), Drangert and Nawab (2011), Schmidlin et al. (2013), Thys et al. (2015)
  • -

    Far from household

Biran et al. (2011), Murthy et al. (1990), Roma et al. (2010)
  • -

    Closer to school than OD site

Caruso et al. (2014a)
  • -

    Costly use fee

London and Esper (2014), Murthy et al. (1990), Roma et al. (2010), Routray et al. (2015)
  • -

    Inadequate number of latrines

Biran et al. (2011), Caruso et al. (2014a), Garn et al. (2014)
  • -

    Latrines closed

Murthy et al. (1990), Ness (2015)
  • -

    Accessible latrine for children with disabilities

Wilbur and Danquah (2015)
Privacy
  • -

    Lack privacy for menstrual hygiene management

Freeman et al. (2013b)
  • -

    Communal latrine (vs. shared with neighbors)

Heijnen et al. (2015a)
  • -

    Shared (vs. individual)

Heijnen et al. (2015b)
  • -

    Wall height at least 1.5m

Barnard et al. (2013)
  • -

    Lack of lock

Caruso et al. (2014a)
  • -

    School latrines built in blocks (vs. separate)

Garn et al. (2014)
  • -

    Absence of door

Barnard et al. (2013), Caruso et al. (2014a), Garn et al. (2014), Njuguna et al. (2008), Routray et al. (2015), Thys et al. (2015), Yimam et al. (2014)
Age of Latrine
  • -

    Older latrine (i.e. behavior change)

Barnard et al. (2013), Biran et al. (2011)
  • -

    Newer latrine (i.e. better maintenance)

Garn et al. (2014)
Cleanliness
  • -

    Dirty, feces and/or bad smell

Caruso et al. (2014a), Freeman et al. (2013b), Garn et al. (2014), London and Esper (2014), Mathew et al. (2008), Murthy et al. (1990), Ness (2015), Njuguna et al. (2008), Pfadenhauer and Rehfuess (2015), Rheinlander et al. (2010), Yimam et al. (2014)

↓= increased use; ↑ = decreased use.