. 2017 May 3;12(5):e0174398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174398

Table 1. Effect of watering, virus accumulation and experimental replicate on aphid transmission efficiency of CaMV and TuMV.

Response trait	Factors^a and interactions	Full model^b			Reduced model
		df^c	Deviance	P-value	df^c	Deviance	P-value
Transmission rate of CaMV^a	Watering	1	24.56	<0.0001	2	30.99	<0.0001
	Virus accumulation (log)	1	1.42	0.232
	Replicate	2	9.93	0.007	2	8.986	0.011
	Watering x Accumulation	1	0.222	0.637
	Watering x Replicate	2	0.367	0.832
	Accumulation x Replicate	2	2.252	0.324
	Replicate x Accumulation x Watering	2	3.253	0.197
Transmission rate of TuMV^a	Watering	1	30.62	<0.0001	2	214.6	<0.0001
	Virus accumulation (log)	1	18.28	<0.0001	2	18.27	0.0002
	Replicate	2	0.489	0.783
	Watering x Accumulation	1	0.357	0.550
	Watering x Replicate	2	1.391	0.500
	Accumulation x Replicate	2	0.990	0.610
	Replicate x Accumulation x Watering	2	10.40	0.006

^a Factors are watering regime (nutrient solution; well-watered vs. water deficit), virus accumulation (log-transformed) and experimental replicate (n = 3).

^b The full model, including all factors and interactions, is tested using a generalized linear model (GLM) with binomial (logit) link function.

^c The reduced model includes only significant terms after sequential removal of non-significant terms and interaction.