Description |
The percentage of patients with an adequately prepared bowel |
Domain |
Pre-procedure |
Category |
Process |
Rationale |
It has been shown that the quality of bowel preparation affects the rates of cecal intubation and adenoma detection. |
Inadequate bowel preparation results in increased costs and inconvenience as the examination has to be rescheduled or alternative investigations have to be organized. |
Construct |
Denominator: Patients undergoing colonoscopy |
Numerator: Patients in the denominator with adequate bowel preparation (assessed with a validated scale, preferably the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS; score ≥6), Ottawa Scale (score ≤7), Aronchick Scale (excellent, good, or fair)) |
Exclusions: Emergency colonoscopies |
Calculation: Proportion (%) |
Level of analysis: Service and individual level |
Frequency: Continuous monitoring using novel endoscopy reporting systems should be the preferred approach;12 an alternative approach is a yearly audit of a sample of 100 consecutive LGI endoscopies |
Standards |
Minimum standard: ≥90% |
Target standard: ≥95% |
Bowel preparation quality, assessed using a validated scale, such as the BBPS, the Ottawa Scale, or the Aronchick Scale, should be included in every colonoscopy report. |
If the minimum standard is not reached, analysis of the factors influencing bowel preparation should be performed on a service level (information given to patients, dietary restrictions, cleansing agent used, colonoscopy timing). |
After evaluation and adjustment, close monitoring should be performed with a further audit within 6 months. |
Consensus agreement |
100% |
PICO |
1.1–1.2 (see Supporting Information) |
Evidence grading |
Moderate quality evidence |