Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 9;8(3):369–376. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12583

Table 3.

Comparison of clinical profile between progressors and non‐progressors

Progresssors Non‐progressors P‐values
No. cases 44 114
Age (years) 57.3 ± 10.2 59.2 ± 9.1 0.549
Duration of diabetes (years) 5.3 ± 7.7 4.6 ± 6.7 0.621
Men/women 28/16 (63.65/36.4%) 79/35 (69.3%/30.7%) 0.492
Body mass index (kg/mm2) 24.0 ± 3.5 24.6 ± 4.0 0.354
HbA1c (NGSP) (%) 6.8 ± 0.7 6.9 ± 0.8 0.656
IFCC (mmol/mol) 50.8 ± 7.6 51.9 ± 8.7
Blood glucose (casual) 8.2 ± 2.6 8.3 ± 2.5 0.891
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 131 ± 12 133 ± 12 0.489
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.5 ± 0.5 4.6 ± 0.6 0.112
LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) 2.3 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.5 0.059
Triglyceride (mmol/L) 1.4 ± 0.8 1.5 ± 0.8 0.470
Hypertension 61.0% 69.3% 0.341
Arteriosclerosis 56.8% 54.4% 0.786
Retinopathy 43.2% 43.9% 0.937
Nephropathy 31.8% 26.3% 0.489
Neuropathy 25.0% 26.3% 0.480
Stage (I/II/III/IV+V) 79.5/20.5/0/0% 85.1/13.2/1.0/0% 0.252

Progressors showed decline of compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) in both median and tibial nerve while non‐progressors did not show decline of CMAP either median or tibial nerves. HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; IFCC, International Federation of Clinical Chemistry; LDL, low‐density lipoprotein; NGSP, National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program.