Skip to main content
. 2017 May 4;8:709. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00709

Table 4.

Ability of a plant species to withstand an abiotic stress and its association with dehydrin architecture.

Stress
Architecture
Organism Drought Cold Salinity Kn YnSKn YnKn SKn KnS Total
M. truncatula + + 1 1 0 2 2 6
P. vulgaris 1 1 1 1 0 4
G. max 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 1 7
C. sativus 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 3
P. persica 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 6
M. domestica 0 + 5 4 1 5 0 15
F. vesca + 0 5 0 1 0 6
A. thaliana + + 1 2 1 5 1 10
A. lyrata + + 4 2 1 2 1 10
C. rubella 0 0 2 2 0 4 1 9
C. grandiflora 0 0 2 0 0 5 1 8
B. stricta + 3 2 0 3 1 9
B. rapa + 0 1 4 1 5 1 12
E. salsugineum 0 + + 0 3 0 4 1 8
C. papaya 0 0 2 0 1 1 4
G. raimondii + + 1 2 1 3 0 7
T. cacao 1 2 0 1 1 5
C. sinensis 0 + 2 2 1 1 2 8
C. clementine 0 1 1 0 1 0 3
M. esculenta 0 0 2 0 1 2 5
R. communis + 0 0 2 1 1 1 5
L. usitatissimum + 2 2 2 4 1 11
P. trichocarpa + 3 0 1 1 1 6
E. grandis 0 –- 2 2 0 1 0 5
V. vinifera 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
S. tuberosum 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 5
S. lycopersicum 0 1 3 0 2 0 6
M. guttatus + 0 2 0 1 1 4
A. coerulea + 1 1 0 2 1 5
S. bicolor + 0 0 3 0 1 1 5
Z. mays 0 3 0 2 2 7
S. italica + 0 5 0 1 0 6
P. virgatum 0 + 0 0 9 0 3 1 13
O. sativa 0 0 6 0 1 1 8
B. distachyon + + 0 0 5 0 4 1 10