Table 4.
Ability of a plant species to withstand an abiotic stress and its association with dehydrin architecture.
Stress |
Architecture |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Organism | Drought | Cold | Salinity | Kn | YnSKn | YnKn | SKn | KnS | Total |
M. truncatula | + | – | + | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
P. vulgaris | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
G. max | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
C. sativus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
P. persica | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
M. domestica | 0 | + | – | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 15 |
F. vesca | – | + | – | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
A. thaliana | + | + | – | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 10 |
A. lyrata | + | + | – | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
C. rubella | – | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 9 |
C. grandiflora | – | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
B. stricta | – | + | – | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
B. rapa | – | + | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 12 |
E. salsugineum | 0 | + | + | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
C. papaya | – | – | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
G. raimondii | + | – | + | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
T. cacao | – | – | – | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
C. sinensis | 0 | + | – | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
C. clementine | 0 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
M. esculenta | – | 0 | – | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
R. communis | + | – | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
L. usitatissimum | – | + | – | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 11 |
P. trichocarpa | – | + | – | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
E. grandis | – | 0 | –- | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
V. vinifera | – | 0 | – | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
S. tuberosum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
S. lycopersicum | – | – | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
M. guttatus | – | + | – | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
A. coerulea | – | + | – | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
S. bicolor | + | – | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Z. mays | – | – | – | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
S. italica | – | + | – | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
P. virgatum | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 13 |
O. sativa | – | – | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
B. distachyon | + | + | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
The resistance ratings were classified into three ranges: good (+), moderate (0), or weak (-). Classifications were obtained from several sources (http://plants.usda.gov/java/characteristics, http://www.fao.org/ag/AGp/agpc/doc/gbase/latinsearch.htm, http://hort.ifas.ufl.edu/database/trees/trees_scientific.shtml, http://dgnurseries.com/product-category/native-plants/, http://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov).