Skip to main content
. 2017 May;19(3):475–484. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.01.007

Table 5.

Performance Metrics of m-ETS Models Compared with Genetically Validated Immunohistochemistry and Chromogenic RNA in Situ Hybridization

m-ETS model Metric
Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
ERG 93 98 97 96
ETV1 93 99 93 99
ETV4 77 100 100 99
ETV5 100 99 50 100

All values are percentages.

NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.