Skip to main content
. 2017 May 3;96(5):1190–1196. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0554

Table 3.

Number (%) of participants seroprevalent for stage-specific malaria antigens by malaria-resistant status and time, the Mother–Offspring Malaria Study, 2002–2006

Antigens Week 24 Week 48 Week 76 Week ≥ 100 P trend for time Total occurrences
Sporozoite and liver stage
CSP
 Nonresistant 98 (29.3) 93 (32.4) 96 (37.7) 131 (41.2) 0.009 418 (35.0)
 Malaria resistant 15 (41.7) 9 (27.3) 11 (52.4) 9 (42.9) 0.121 44 (39.6)
SLARP
 Nonresistant 58 (17.4) 80 (27.9) 100 (39.2) 140 (44.0) <.0001 378 (31.7)
 Malaria resistant 6 (16.7) 15 (45.5) 8 (38.1) 10 (47.6) 0.821 39 (35.1)
Late liver stage
LISP1*
 Nonresistant 58 (17.4) 49 (17.1) 67 (26.3) 126 (39.6) < 0.0001 300 (25.1)
 Malaria resistant 2 (5.6) 5 (15.2) 1 (4.8) 7 (33.3) 0.210 15 (13.5)
Merozoite stage
MSP1*
 Nonresistant 84 (25.2) 94 (32.8) 92 (36.1) 91 (28.6) 0.482 361 (30.2)
 Malaria resistant 2 (5.6) 1 (3.0) 3 (14.3) 0 (0.0) 0.744 6 (5.4)
AMA1*
 Nonresistant 120 (35.9) 73 (25.4) 88 (34.5) 116 (36.5) 0.0002 397 (33.3)
 Malaria resistant 6 (16.7) 0 (0.0) 2 (9.5) 0 (0.0) 0.017 8 (7.2)

AMA1 = apical membrane antigen 1; CSP = circumsporozoite protein; LISP1 = liver specific protein 1; MSP1 = merozoite surface protein 1; SLARP = sporozoite and liver stage asparagine-rich protein. Seroprevalent cut-point defined as mean + 2 × standard deviation of log-transformed level from a nonimmune U.S. adult (N = 20).

*

P < 0.05, differences between malaria-resistant and nonresistant children tested in unadjusted generalized estimating equation (GEE) models (binomial distribution, autoregressive correlation matrix).

P test for trend: Week entered as ordinal variable (week 48 − week ≥ 100), modeled in GEE models (Autoregressive correlation matrix).