Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Haematol. 2016 Sep 14;3(10):e456–e466. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30110-7

Table 2.

Diffusion Tensor Imaging of White Matter Integrity and Neurobehavioral Outcomes

Frontostriatal tract Frontal lobes Parietal lobes
FA AD RD FA AD RD FA AD RD
BRIEF domains Est. (SE) P* Est. (SE) P* Est. (SE) P* Est. (SE) P* Est. (SE) P* Est. (SE) P* Est. (SE) P* Est. (SE) P* Est. (SE) P*
Inhibit −16·1 (10·9) 0·15 6·2 (7·7) 0·44 13·5 (7·1) 0·059 3·4 (13·6) 0·80 17·4 (6·7) 0·027 13·1 (7·7) 0·11 12·1 (10·3) 0·98 15·5 (7·6) 0·076 1·14 (8·1) 0·89
Shift −18·0 (8·5) 0·054 4·6 (6·0) 0·44 13·5 (5·5) 0·018 −4·8 (10·5) 0·80 9·6 (5·2) 0·086 8·0 (6·0) 0·18 3·1 (8·1) 0·91 13·6 (5·9) 0·050 6·6 (6·3) 0·43
Emotional control −12·9 (11·8) 0·27 15·4 (8·2) 0·43 15·6 (7·6) 0·046 −4·2 (14·6) 0·80 20·5 (7·1) 0·018 16·1 (8·2) 0·098 −17·6 (11·1) 0·98 14·6 (8·2) 0·086 9·8 (8·7) 0·43
BRI −48·9 (28·4) 0·10 35·3 (19·9) 0·43 48·0 (18·4) 0·016 −14·5 (35·3) 0·80 64·0 (17·0) 0·0022 51·9 (19·6) 0·093 0·51 (26·9) 0·98 47·7 (19·7) 0·050 29·7 (20·9) 0·43
Initiate −18·3 (8·9) 0·058 9·2 (6·3) 0·43 15·0 (5·8) 0·016 −9·1 (11·1) 0·75 7·7 (5·6) 0·16 8·9 (6·3) 0·17 1·4 (8·5) 0·95 14·1 (6·2) 0·050 7·7 (6·6) 0·43
Working memory −40·3 (13·2) 0·023 10·7 (9·5) 0·44 28·0 (8·6) 0·0070 −16·4 (16·6) 0·75 18·1 (8·3) 0·054 19·1 (9·4) 0·098 6·0 (12·7) 0·97 18·1 (9·4) 0·076 6·4 (9·9) 0·57
Plan/Organize −43·4 (15·6) 0·023 9·3 (11·2) 0·44 30·3 (10·2) 0·0099 −13·6 (19·8) 0·77 18·3 (9·8) 0·086 18·7 (11·2) 0·11 3·4 (15·1) 0·95 26·3 (11·1) 0·050 11·9 (11·8) 0·43
Organization of Materials −25·4 (9·8) 0·023 5·4 (7·0) 0·44 16·3 (6·4) 0·016 15·8 (12·2) 0·75 14·6 (6·0) 0·038 15·6 (6·9) 0·093 −6·8 (9·4) 0·98 12·8 (6·9) 0·080 12·8 (7·3) 0·43
Monitor −20·6 (9·0) 0·044 5·4 (6·4) 0·44 15·6 (5·9) 0·016 −9·9 (11·3) 0·75 8·1 (5·6) 0·16 10·9 (6·4) 0·11 2·4 (8·6) 0·95 8·9 (6·4) 0·16 4·8 (6·8) 0·57
Metacognition Index −145·5 (49·7) 0·023 38·2 (35·6) 0·44 102·9 (32·4) 0·0070 −60·6 (62·6) 0·75 63·8 (31·1) 0·068 69·3 (35·3) 0·098 9·0 (48·0) 0·95 79·1 (35·2) 0·050 41·9 (37·4) 0·43
GEC −194·4 (72·7) 0·023 73·5 (51·8) 0·43 150·9 (47·2) 0·0070 −75·2 (91·3) 0·75 127·7 (44·8) 0·018 121·1 (51·1) 0·093 8·2 (69·9) 0·96 126·8 (51·1) 0·050 71·6 (54·4) 0·43
*

P values for the association between neurobehavioral outcomes (raw scores of the BRIEF domains, as well as the overall BRI and Metacognition indices) and white matter integrity at follow-up (FA, AD and RD measures) within the frontostriatal tract and the frontal and parietal lobes. General linear modeling was used to examine the associations, adjusting for age at evaluation. All models have been adjusted for false discovery rate. A higher raw score on the BRIEF is indicative of more neurobehavioral problems.

Within the frontostriatal tract, higher FA was associated with fewer problems on all of the metacognitive domains while higher RD was associated with more problems. However, the association of neurobehavioral problems with white matter integrity was weaker within the frontal and parietal lobes, as compared to the frontostriatal tract.

Abbreviations: AD, axial diffusivity; BRI, Behavioral Regulation Index; BRIEF, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function; Est, estimate; FA, fractional anisotropy; GEC, Global Executive Composite; RD, radial diffusivity; SE, standard error