Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 26;3:2329048X16669912. doi: 10.1177/2329048X16669912

Table 1.

Comparison of Conduction Study Results of Our Patient to Those Reported by Li et al.2

Our Patient Patient Reported by Li et ala
Sex Male Male
Age at examination, years 13b 16b 30
Motor nerve conduction velocities/compound muscle action potentials, m/s, mV (O–P)
 Right median 37.5/0.81 40.4/0.16 43.4/1.2
 Right ulnar 45.9/0.53 52.0/0.48 Not available
 Right tibial anterior 101/1.73 36.3/0.049 Not available
 Right deep peroneal 35.2/1.02 52.9/0.51 Not available
 Right peroneus Not done Not done 32.5/0.1
 Left peroneus Not done Not done 34.9/0.2
Sensory nerve conduction velocities/sensory nerve action potentials, m/s, µV
 Right median 60.4/13.2 62.2/12.2 58/45
 Right ulnar 59.5/8.1 57.7/4.7 Not available
 Right radial 61.7/30.3 Not done Not available
 Right sural 52.9/8.5 46.1/7.8 Not available
 Left sural Not done Not done 55.5/39
 Right peroneus Not done Not done 63.3/41
 Left peroneus Not done Not done 61.2/34

aConduction studies were done only for 1 patient in the study of Li et al.2

bOur patient was examined twice, at different ages.