Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fam Relat. 2017 Jan 17;65(5):701–715. doi: 10.1111/fare.12218

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of the Sample and Distribution of Study Variables

Characteristic n %
Gender
    Male 1,271 44.03
    Female 2,299 55.97
Marital status
    Married 960 32.91
    Partnered 260 8.74
    Separated 286 7.16
    Divorced 524 11.75
    Widowed 353 7.89
    Never married 1,170 31.55
Parental status
    Does not have child 668 21.76
    Has child 2,769 78.24
Employment status
    Employed full-time 1,795 50.80
    Employed part-time 538 16.02
    Unemployed 366 10.08
    Retired 99 2.57
    Homemaker 77 2.73
    Student 371 9.84
    Disabled/other 314 7.96
Religious affiliation
    Baptist 1,865 49.08
    Methodist 216 5.88
    Episcopalian 17 .45
    Pentecostal 304 8.62
    Catholic 202 5.96
    Other Christian 549 17.25
    Other religion 71 2.25
    Unaffiliated 344 10.51
Social network types
    Optimal 811 22.76
    Ambivalent 1097 30.78
    Family-centered 686 19.26
    Strained 970 27.21

Characteristic M SD Range

Age 43.15 16.32 18–93
Education 12.30 2.58 0–17
Household income (annual) 32,037.15 32,687.94 0–520,000
Number of children aged 13+ years 1.61 2.05 0–15
Frequency of contact with family 6.13 1.28 1–7
Subjective closeness to family 3.64 0.65 1–4
Family loves 3.52 0.73 1–4
Family listens 2.79 1.12 1–4
Family interested 3.41 0.84 1–4
Family demands 2.04 1.03 1–4
Family criticizes 1.86 0.95 1–4
Family takes advantage 1.61 0.91 1–4
Frequency of contact with congregants 3.75 1.83 1–6
Subjective closeness to congregants 3.02 0.95 1–4
Congregants loves 3.44 0.78 1–4
Congregants listens 2.30 1.18 1–4
Congregants interested 3.13 1.00 1–4
Congregants demands 1.71 0.89 1–4
Congregants criticizes 1.44 0.77 1–4
Congregants takes advantage 1.29 0.66 1–4

Note. Percentages are weighted and frequencies are unweighted.