Table 1.
Demographic Characteristics of the Sample and Distribution of Study Variables
| Characteristic | n | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Male | 1,271 | 44.03 | |
| Female | 2,299 | 55.97 | |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 960 | 32.91 | |
| Partnered | 260 | 8.74 | |
| Separated | 286 | 7.16 | |
| Divorced | 524 | 11.75 | |
| Widowed | 353 | 7.89 | |
| Never married | 1,170 | 31.55 | |
| Parental status | |||
| Does not have child | 668 | 21.76 | |
| Has child | 2,769 | 78.24 | |
| Employment status | |||
| Employed full-time | 1,795 | 50.80 | |
| Employed part-time | 538 | 16.02 | |
| Unemployed | 366 | 10.08 | |
| Retired | 99 | 2.57 | |
| Homemaker | 77 | 2.73 | |
| Student | 371 | 9.84 | |
| Disabled/other | 314 | 7.96 | |
| Religious affiliation | |||
| Baptist | 1,865 | 49.08 | |
| Methodist | 216 | 5.88 | |
| Episcopalian | 17 | .45 | |
| Pentecostal | 304 | 8.62 | |
| Catholic | 202 | 5.96 | |
| Other Christian | 549 | 17.25 | |
| Other religion | 71 | 2.25 | |
| Unaffiliated | 344 | 10.51 | |
| Social network types | |||
| Optimal | 811 | 22.76 | |
| Ambivalent | 1097 | 30.78 | |
| Family-centered | 686 | 19.26 | |
| Strained | 970 | 27.21 | |
| Characteristic | M | SD | Range |
| Age | 43.15 | 16.32 | 18–93 |
| Education | 12.30 | 2.58 | 0–17 |
| Household income (annual) | 32,037.15 | 32,687.94 | 0–520,000 |
| Number of children aged 13+ years | 1.61 | 2.05 | 0–15 |
| Frequency of contact with family | 6.13 | 1.28 | 1–7 |
| Subjective closeness to family | 3.64 | 0.65 | 1–4 |
| Family loves | 3.52 | 0.73 | 1–4 |
| Family listens | 2.79 | 1.12 | 1–4 |
| Family interested | 3.41 | 0.84 | 1–4 |
| Family demands | 2.04 | 1.03 | 1–4 |
| Family criticizes | 1.86 | 0.95 | 1–4 |
| Family takes advantage | 1.61 | 0.91 | 1–4 |
| Frequency of contact with congregants | 3.75 | 1.83 | 1–6 |
| Subjective closeness to congregants | 3.02 | 0.95 | 1–4 |
| Congregants loves | 3.44 | 0.78 | 1–4 |
| Congregants listens | 2.30 | 1.18 | 1–4 |
| Congregants interested | 3.13 | 1.00 | 1–4 |
| Congregants demands | 1.71 | 0.89 | 1–4 |
| Congregants criticizes | 1.44 | 0.77 | 1–4 |
| Congregants takes advantage | 1.29 | 0.66 | 1–4 |
Note. Percentages are weighted and frequencies are unweighted.