Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychobiol. 2017 Mar 6;59(4):543–550. doi: 10.1002/dev.21511

Table 3.

Multiple regression analysis of RSA suppression predicting child behavior problems and compliance

Variable Entered B SE (B) β T
Predicting child behavior problems on ECBI
Play direction given by mother
  Child Age −0.077 0.020 −0.497 −3.876***
  Child Sex −0.202 0.064 −0.401 −3.158**
  RSACDI(M) 0.024 0.031 0.113 0.784
  RSAS(M) 0.199 0.067 0.419 2.955**
  R2=.470, F(4,35)=7.773, p=.000.
Play direction given by staff
  Child Age −0.053 0.023 −0.345 −2.335*
  Child Sex −0.212 0.067 −0.420 −3.140**
  RSACDI(S) −0.019 0.029 −0.097 −0.677
  RSAS(S) −0.124 0.068 −0.277 −1.827^
  R2=.384, F(4,36)=5.608, p=.001
Predicting child compliance with adult direction
Play direction given by mother
  Child Age 0.060 0.056 0.176 1.073
  Child Sex 0.069 0.181 0.063 0.383
  RSACDI(M) −0.101 0.094 −0.201 −1.083
  RSAS(M) −0.513 0.197 −0.481 −2.612*
  R2=.188, F(4,32)=1.854, p=.143
Play direction given by staff
  Child Age −0.045 0.059 −0.132 −0.763
  Child Sex 0.146 0.173 0.136 0.844
  RSACDI(S) 0.193 0.076 0.441 2.554*
  RSAS(S) 0.148 0.171 0.153 0.867
  R2=.199, F(4,32)=1.990, p=.120

Note:

*

= p < .05,

**

= p < .01,

^

= p <.10

RSAS(M)=RSA suppression from child-directed to adult-directed interaction with mother; RSAS(S)=RSA suppression from child-directed to adult-directed interaction with staff; Child Sex is coded as 1=male, 2=female