Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr;9(4):1023–1031. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.71

Table 3. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for lymph node involvement.

Variable Multivariate analysis
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Odds ratio P Odds ratio P Odds ratio P
Tumor size (1 cm increase) 1.223 (0.716–2.008) 0.461 1.007 (0.564–1.797) 0.982 0.941 (0.505–1.754) 0.849
Elevated CEA (vs. normal) 2.093 (0.858–5.108) 0.105 1.781 (0.706–4.492) 0.222 2.124 (0.799–5.644) 0.131
Central location (vs. peripheral) 6.409 (1.813–22.649) 0.004 5.784 (1.584–21.114) 0.008 7.946 (1.657–38.106) 0.010
Solid nodule type (vs. GGO) 8.354 (1.074–64.995) 0.043 4.575 (0.550–38.059) 0.159 3.804 (0.443–32.641) 0.223
Visceral pleural invasion (vs. absent) 3.378 (1.542–7.399) 0.002 3.044 (1.369–6.769) 0.006 2.840 (1.246–6.476) 0.013
Tumor SUVmax (1 unite increase) 1.147 (1.035-1.272) 0.009 1.249 (1.119–1.394) <0.001
Micropapillary and solid patterns (vs. absent) 1.949 (0.780–4.872) 0.153

SUVmax, the maximum standardized uptake value; GGO, ground-glass opacity.