Table 3. Bias and MSE of mapgd, VCFtools, KING, and PLINK in estimating coancestry, fraternity, and inbreeding for outbred and inbred siblings.
Coancestry (Θ) | Out. | In. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program | Cov. | Bias (×103) | MSE (×104) | Bias (×103) | MSE (×104) |
mapgd | 3× | −10 | 2.2 | −11.6 | 2.5 |
VCFtools | 3× | −68 | 50 | −150 | 230 |
KING | 3× | −120 | 170 | −450 | 2000 |
mapgd | 10× | −6.9 | 0.73 | −8.2 | 1.5 |
VCFtools | 10× | −12.0 | 1.8 | −16 | 3.3 |
KING | 10× | −21 | 4.7 | −520 | 2700 |
mapgd | 30× | −6.4 | 0.69 | −7.2 | 1.0 |
VCFtools | 30× | −5.7 | 0.70 | −4.5 | 1.0 |
KING | 30× | −3.1 | 0.29 | −500 | 2500 |
Fraternity | Out. | In. | |||
Program | Cov. | Bias (×103) | MSE (×104) | Bias (×103) | MSE (×104) |
mapgd | 3× | −7.2 | 22 | −0.3 | 23 |
PLINK | 3× | −20 | 7.1 | 72 | 52 |
KING | 3× | 370 | 1400 | 230 | 520 |
mapgd | 10× | −1.7 | 4.3 | −1.4 | 5.8 |
PLINK | 10× | 11 | 2.3 | 110 | 120 |
KING | 10× | 58 | 36 | 400 | 1700 |
mapgd | 30× | 1.2 | 4.3 | 8.6 | 6.1 |
PLINK | 30× | 1.7 | 1.6 | 120 | 150 |
KING | 30× | −3.5 | 1.7 | 360 | 1300 |
Inbreeding | Out. | In. | |||
Program | Cov. | Bias (×103) | MSE (×104) | Bias (×103) | MSE (×104) |
mapgd | −14 | 7.1 | −33 | 18 | |
VCFtools | 99 | 100 | −100 | 110 | |
PLINK | 72 | 54 | −150 | 220 | |
mapgd | −8.5 | 1.6 | −7.0 | 1.3 | |
VCFtools | 15 | 3.5 | −11 | 9.5 | |
PLINK | 12 | 2.4 | −7.4 | 1.2 | |
mapgd | −9.0 | 1.9 | −7.6 | 1.6 | |
VCFtools | −0.1 | 1.9 | −3.8 | 1.3 | |
PLINK | −2.2 | 1.4 | −2.4 | 0.9 |
The values of all seven IBD coefficients are listed in Table S5 in File S1. Results are from 100 simulations on a 400-kbp, 400-cM genome containing SNPs. See Section S7 in File S1 for SNP filtering parameters. Out., outbred; in., inbred; cov. coverage. See figure S7 for diagram of outbred and inbred siblings.