Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 27;206(1):91–104. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.200063

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of GeneImp with BEAGLE. (A) Imputation mean-R2 as a function of MAF. Each point is computed by averaging the R2 values for SNPs within a MAF bin. The size of the marker reflects the number of SNPs in the MAF-bin. BEAGLE has the highest mean-R2 followed closely by GeneImp-5-window-average. (B) Calibration of genotype posterior probabilities. Imputed genotypes are split into bins according to their posterior probability distribution. We plot the mean posterior probability in each bin (x-axis) against the percentage of correctly predicted genotypes in each bin (y-axis). BEAGLE and GeneImp-5-window-average are well-calibrated, while GeneImp-single-window is overconfident.