Skip to main content
. 2017 May 5;15:7. doi: 10.1186/s12962-017-0069-4

Table 2.

The vaccine comparators and schedules used in each economic evaluation

Vaccine Number of studies—no vaccine Number of studies—type of vaccine Number of studies—vaccine programb Funding and target populationc
Escherichia coli 1 (0/1)a Private
Group B Streptococcus 1 (1/1) Not yet available
Hepatitis A 1 Private
Hepatitis B 5 (3/5) 1 Public-universal
Hepatitis C 1 (1/1) Not yet available
Herpes Zoster 2 (2/2) Private
HPV 7 (7/7) 4 2 Public-universal
Influenza—(seasonal and H1N1) 6 (5/6) 1 4 Public-Universal/targeted
Measles or Mumps or MMR 2 (2/2) 3 Public-universal
Meningococcal A, C, Y, W135 2 (1/2) 2 1 Public-universal
Meningitis B 1 (0/1) Public-targeted/private
Pertussis 1 (1/1) 2 2 Public-universal
Pneumococcal 4 (4/4) 4 1 Public-universal
Rabies 1 (1/1) Private
Rotavirus 2 (2/2) 2 Public-universal
Tetanus 1 (1/1) Public-universal
Varicella 3 (2/3) 1 Public-universal

a Ratio represents the number of studies that found the vaccine was cost-effective compared to no vaccine

b For example: schedule, booster dose, universal vs. targeted

c Funding and target population for vaccines as of March 2015