Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Mar 2;77:156–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.02.002

Table 2.

Rater scores for Motivational Interviewing competence and MITI scores

Item (N = 18)
M (SD)
Project/MI Competence Ratings
 Balance of strengths and challenges 3.83 (0.49)
 Provide examples from the videotaped assessment 4.11 (0.50)
 Responded appropriately to confusion 3.38 (0.48)
 Express empathy 3.75 (0.52)
 Develop discrepancy 3.17 (0.49)
 Roll with resistance a 3.50 (0.71)
 Support self-efficacy 2.89 (0.50)
 Open-ended questions 4.00 (0.54)
 Reflective listening 3.92 (0.67)
 Affirm 3.75 (0.69)
 Summarize 3.09 (0.48)
 Elicit change talk 3.44 (0.51)
MITI Scores
 Evocation 4.08 (0.43)
 Collaboration 4.00 (0.59)
 Autonomy 3.97 (0.44)
 Direction 4.06 (0.57)
 Empathy 4.11 (0.50)

Note: Competence ratings were answered on a 5-point scale: 1 “Poor”, 3 “Good”, 5 “Excellent”. MITI = Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code Version 3.0 items were answered on a 5-point scale from 1 “low” to 5 “high”.

a

14 cases were rated on this item; for the rest resistance was not identified