Table 2.
Item | (N = 18) M (SD) |
---|---|
Project/MI Competence Ratings | |
Balance of strengths and challenges | 3.83 (0.49) |
Provide examples from the videotaped assessment | 4.11 (0.50) |
Responded appropriately to confusion | 3.38 (0.48) |
Express empathy | 3.75 (0.52) |
Develop discrepancy | 3.17 (0.49) |
Roll with resistance a | 3.50 (0.71) |
Support self-efficacy | 2.89 (0.50) |
Open-ended questions | 4.00 (0.54) |
Reflective listening | 3.92 (0.67) |
Affirm | 3.75 (0.69) |
Summarize | 3.09 (0.48) |
Elicit change talk | 3.44 (0.51) |
MITI Scores | |
Evocation | 4.08 (0.43) |
Collaboration | 4.00 (0.59) |
Autonomy | 3.97 (0.44) |
Direction | 4.06 (0.57) |
Empathy | 4.11 (0.50) |
Note: Competence ratings were answered on a 5-point scale: 1 “Poor”, 3 “Good”, 5 “Excellent”. MITI = Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code Version 3.0 items were answered on a 5-point scale from 1 “low” to 5 “high”.
14 cases were rated on this item; for the rest resistance was not identified