Skip to main content
. 2017 May 4;100(5):695–705. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.04.003

Table 1.

Factors Contributing to Bottlenecks in the Gene-Discovery Pipeline

Clinical data
  • non-specific clinical presentations (e.g., developmental delay and hypotonia)

  • ultra-rare and unrecognized genetic diseases

  • lack of ontology encompassing the complete spectrum of human phenotypes

  • insufficient utilization of ontologies or 3D facial-gestalt analysis in phenotyping

  • inconsistent multidisciplinary approaches to patient evaluation

  • inability to account for and compare age-specific disease presentations

Genomic data
  • technical limitations of WES (e.g., copy-number variants and structural variation are not captured well)

  • lack of standardized technical and informatics approaches

  • incompleteness of population-specific control datasets

Data discovery and sharing
  • lack of a widely adopted data-sharing framework

  • lack of common data-sharing standards

  • lack of a systematic way to record data-use conditions

  • lack of a privacy-preserving linkage system for each research participant

Genetic evidence
  • siloed datasets

  • lack of and use of data-sharing infrastructure

Functional evidence
  • lack of standardized and moderate-throughput analyses of variant impact

  • lack of biological insight into the function of most human genes

Novel disease mechanisms
  • lack of expertise in the analysis of non-coding variants

  • other mechanisms including tissue-specific mosaicism, methylation, and di- or oligogenic inheritance