Table 2.
Compound | IC50a (μM) | |
---|---|---|
AR | AGEs formation | |
1 | 90.39 ± 1.91∗∗ | 20.71 ± 1.38∗∗ |
2 | 131.37 ± 0.12∗ | 82.43 ± 1.52∗∗ |
3 | >200 | 311.89 ± 11.26∗∗ |
4 | 2.93 ± 0.11∗∗ | 185.56 ± 0.20∗∗ |
5 | 110.65 ± 9.89∗∗ | 169.61 ± 16.41∗∗ |
6 | 30.29 ± 3.95∗ | 134.88 ± 0.84∗∗ |
7 | 102.53 ± 7.81∗∗ | 207.70 ± 13.32∗∗ |
8 | 3.19 ± 0.10∗∗ | 197.38 ± 11.03∗∗ |
9 | 3.32 ± 0.21∗∗ | 67.42 ± 9.95∗∗ |
10 | 10.60 ± 0.38∗∗ | 109.46 ± 1.41∗∗ |
11 | 12.53 ± 0.20∗∗ | 129.15 ± 4.01∗∗ |
12 | 4.54 ± 0.16∗∗ | 176.16 ± 5.77∗∗ |
13 | 0.22 ± 0.01∗∗ | 24.85 ± 1.86∗∗ |
14 | 1.90 ± 0.01∗∗ | 124.28 ± 4.25∗∗ |
15 | 1.25 ± 0.01∗∗ | 31.78 ± 0.56∗∗ |
16 | 1.48 ± 0.04∗∗ | 44.45 ± 4.86∗∗ |
17 | >200 | NDd |
18 | >200 | NDd |
19 | >200 | NDd |
20 | >200 | 1048.99 ± 0.11∗ |
TMGb | 6.58 ± 0.19∗ | — |
AGc | — | 414.77 ± 5.96∗ |
aIC50 calculated from the least-squares regression line of the logarithmic concentrations plotted against the residual activity.
bTMG was used as a positive control.
cAG was used as a positive control.
dND was not detected.
∗Significant difference from control; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01.