Skip to main content
. 2017 May 8;8:706. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00706

Table 4.

QTL identified for nine traits of maize using high-density SNP bin-map from composite interval mapping (CIM).

Trait QTL Chr Flanking markers Positions (Mb) Interval (100 Kb) Physical length (Mb) LOD ADDa DOMb R2 (%) QTL-MIc References
PERMUTATION 1,000 TIMES WITH ALPHA = 0.05
KW qKW-1 Lg3 mk1315–mk1322 204.30 2,036.51–2,065.51 2.900 4.5 −1.54 1.23 7.7
qKW-2 Lg4 mk1708–mk1711 205.80 2,055.51–2,063.01 0.750 4.8 −0.16 2.43 7.4
qKW-3 Lg6 mk2201–mk2203 5.95 40.42–64.69 2.427 7.5 1.96 1.44 13
qKW-4 Lg8 mk2775–mk2777 119.70 1,194.01–1,206.01 1.200 5.5 −1.89 0.99 9.5
EAL qEAL-1 Lg1 mk478–mk492 254.45 2,493.51–2,554.51 6.100 4.1 −0.84 −0.44 8.2
qEAL-2 Lg6 mk2219–mk2227 27.45 198.01–363.01 16.500 4.1 0.99 −0.54 8.1
qEAL-3 Lg10 mk3282–mk3292 145.20 1,440.51–1,466.51 2.600 4.9 −0.33 1.24 9
EAD qEAD-1 Lg1 mk331–mk339 196.50 1,963.01–1,981.01 1.800 4.7 0.14 0.06 8.3 184.9–187.4 Xue et al., 2013
qEAD-2 Lg4 mk1648–mk1652 185.35 1,839.51–1,855.51 1.600 5.3 0.13 0.13 9.2 190.78–217.64 Beavis et al., 1994
qEAD-3 Lg7 mk2348–mk2353 5.15 47.01–63.51 1.650 4.3 0.09 0.17 6.9
qEAD-4 Lg7 mk2468–mk2471 108.30 1,073.01–1,089.01 1.600 4.0 0.11 0.17 6.4
qEAD-5 Lg7 mk2541–mk2544 154.00 1,537.01–1,552.51 1.550 7.0 0.12 0.19 11.6 147.16 Xue et al., 2013
143.17–161.8 Austin and Lee, 1996
CD qCD-1 Lg1 mk298–mk303 180.20 1,781.01–1,823.01 4.200 9.1 0.17 0.06 18 187.4 Xue et al., 2013
qCD-2 Lg2 mk700–mk708 36.95 333.51–371.51 3.800 4.6 0.06 0.12 7.7
KRN qKRN-1 Lg8 mk2821–mk2830 160.65 1,588.01–1,635.51 4.750 4.1 0.68 −0.39 7.6 163.5–164.6 Xiao et al., 2016
CGR qCGR-1 Lg4 mk1407–mk1408 2.80 27.01–29.01 0.200 5.4 0.80 3.04 10
qCGR-2 Lg4 mk1414–mk1420 4.95 38.51–67.51 2.900 5.3 0.44 3.07 9.8
qCGR-3 Lg6 mk2267–mk2269 106.25 1,057.05–1,072.51 1.546 4.0 1.97 −0.10 8.2 106.47 Yang et al., 2014
EW qEW-1 Lg4 mk1399–mk1419 3.25 3.01–61.01 5.800 4.2 9.53 15.53 8.4 3.7-4.7 Xiao et al., 2016
qEW-2 Lg4 mk1650–mk1660 185.55 1,850.51–1,876.51 2.600 5.2 13.29 12.19 10.4 186.1–187.4 Xiao et al., 2016
qEW-3 Lg7 mk2462–mk2467 106.00 1,052.51–1,073.01 2.050 5.2 51.91 18.99 19.7
qEW-4 Lg7 mk2468–mk2473 107.95 1,073.01–1,110.01 3.700 5.1 8.19 20.05 9.7
qEW-5 Lg7 mk2483–mk2484 122.30 1,216.51–1,232.01 1.550 4.4 −8.80 19.78 8.2
GWP qGWP-1 Lg4 mk1648–mk1659 185.55 1,839.51–1,874.51 3.500 5.3 12.35 6.75 10.7 186.1–187.4 Xiao et al., 2016
qGWP-2 Lg6 mk2220–mk2240 52.95 207.01–614.01 40.700 4.4 14.33 −4.68 11.8
qGWP-3 Lg7 mk2462–mk2474 106.00 1,052.51–1,135.51 8.300 5.1 38.77 15.88 9.2
qGWP-4 Lg7 mk2468–mk2478 107.95 1,073.01–1,083.01 1.000 4.7 3.40 16.53 8.6 107.4–108.2 Xiao et al., 2016
qGWP-5 Lg7 mk2485–mk2489 124.05 1,232.01–1,265.51 3.350 4.5 −5.63 16.36 8.1
a

Estimated additive effect.

b

Estimated dominance effect.

c

Marker interval of QTLs identified in previous studies.