Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 26;13(3):617–623. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.61815

Table III.

Results of follow-up surgical excision of LN diagnosed on core-needle biopsy: literature review and current study

Study Ref. N ALH LCIS LN No. of upgrades (%) Risk factors for upgrading
Middleton (2003) [22] 17 6 9 2 6 (35.3) Mass lesion
Arpino (2004) [16] 21 NA NA 21 3 (14.3)
Elsheikh & Silverman (2005) [32] 33 20 13 NA 9 (27.3) Mass lesion, pleomorphic histology
Renshaw (2006) [13] 92 40 52 NA 3 (3.26)
Esserman (2007) [18] 26 NA NA 26 2 (7.69) Diffuse LCISb
Ciangiarella (2008) [20] 38 18 20 NA 3 (7.89) Mass lesion
Hwang (2008) [36] 87 48 39 NA 10 (11.5) Imaging-histologic discordance, pleomorphic histology
Menon (2008) [34] 25 NA NA 25a 9 (36.0) Mass lesion, imaging-histologic discordance
Nagi (2008) [35] 45 NA NA 45 2 (4.44)
Polom (2009) [10] 20 11 9 NA 8 (40.0) Mass lesion, architectural distortion on mammography
Flegg (2010) [11] 9 4 5 NA 2 (22.2)
Rendi (2012) [24] 68 20 48 NA 3 (4.41) Imaging-histologic discordance, women at high risk, extensive LCISc
Murray (2013) [19] 80 34 46a NA 5 (6.25) Imaging-histologic discordance
Current study 27 NA 27 NA 8 (29.6) Mass lesion, BIRADS category 5, pleomorphic histology, palpability
Total 588 201 268 119 73 (12.4)

NA – not applicable;

a

classic type,

b

> 1 lobule per core;

c

> 4 foci.