Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 11;4(5):292–304. doi: 10.1002/acn3.406

Table 3.

Cross‐sectional statistics of significant differences in qMRI outcomes between SMA outpatients and HV at a particular visit

Visit 1 Visit 2 Visit 3 Visit 4
Statistic P‐value Statistic P‐value Statistic P‐value Statistic P‐value
T 2 F(1, 36) = 47.805 4.05E‐08 F(1, 36) = 46.726 5.15E‐08 F(1, 36) = 49.616 2.73E‐08 F(1, 37) = 49.826 2.34E‐08
DIXON FF F(1, 35) = 58.047 6.01E‐09 F(1, 35) = 57.432 6.76E‐09 F(1, 35) = 59.244 4.78E‐09 F(1, 35) = 60.985 3.40E‐09
MP‐FF F(1, 36) = 57.048 6.47E‐09 F(1, 36) = 58.461 5.08E‐09 F(1, 36) = 62.389 2.45E‐09 F(1, 36) = 64.510 1.56E‐09
CSA F(1, 36) = 55.220 9.16E‐09 F(1, 36) = 58.609 4.71E‐09 F(1, 36) = 55.300 9.02E‐09 F(1, 36) = 60.278 3.13E‐09

All alpha levels for a visit are corrected using Bonferroni adjustment. CSA, muscle cross‐sectional area; FF, fat fraction; HV, healthy volunteers; SMA, spinal muscular atrophy.