Skip to main content
. 2017 May 8;11:236. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00236

Table 2.

Genes screened in tinnitus candidate gene studies.

Gene MIM Gene function Number of subjects Phenotype Method Outcome Stastical power Multiple testing correction References
CARDIOVASCULAR ASSOCIATED GENES
ACE 106180 Angiotensin I converting enzyme 89 Severe chronic tinnitus PCR-RFLP genotyping -No significance Not described Not described Yüce et al., 2016
ADD1 102680 Adducin 1 89 Severe chronic tinnitus PCR-RFLP genotyping -The p.G460W heterozygous genotype (p = 0.009) and W allele (p = 0.021) are statistically significantly higher in patients than controls Not described Not described Yüce et al., 2016
NEUROTROPHIC FACTORS
BDNF 113505 Brain derived neurotrophic factor 240 Chronic tinnitus PCR-RFLP genotyping -No correlation between tinnitus and rs2049046 and rs6265 polymorphisms Underpowered, nearly 15,000 patients and >680,000 controls required for exclusion of a modifying risk from rs6265 Yes Sand et al., 2012b
GDNF 600837 Glial cell derived neurotrophic factor 52 Chronic tinnitus PCR-RFLP genotyping -No correlation between tinnitus and rs884344, rs3812047 and rs1110149 polymorphisms -Heterozygosity was significantly lower (p = 0.02) for rs1110149 between patients and controls Not described Not described Orenay-Boyacioglu et al., 2016
240 Chronic tinnitus PCR-RFLP genotyping -No correlation between tinnitus and rs1110149, rs884344 and rs3812047 polymorphisms Underpowered Yes Sand et al., 2012b
POTASSIUM RECYCLING PATHWAY GENES
KCNE1 176261 Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E regulatory subunit 1 201 Chronic tinnitus Sanger sequencing -No correlation between tinnitus severity and 46 polymorphic variants -V47I novel variant detected Underpowered, >12,500 patients required to exclude a modifying allele risk No Sand et al., 2010
128 Noise exposed males with tinnitus SNP genotyping -Significance was detected in rs915539 (p = 0.005) in noise-resistant subjects and when comparing tinnitus patients vs. controls in noise-resistant and susceptible groups (p = 0.018) Not described No Pawełczyk et al., 2012
KCNE3 604433 Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily E regulatory subunit 3 288 Chronic tinnitus Sanger sequencing -No association between tinnitus and 11 polymorphic variants Underpowered, 2,707 patients and 65,083 controls required No Sand et al., 2011
SLC12A2 600840 Solute carrier family 12 member 2 128 Noise exposed males with tinnitus SNP genotyping -Significance was detected in rs10089 (p = 0.016) in noise susceptible subjects and when comparing tinnitus patients vs. controls in noise-resistant and susceptible groups (p = 0.026) Not described No Pawełczyk et al., 2012
GABAB RECEPTOR SUBUNIT
KCTD12 610521 Potassium channel tetramerization domain containing 12 95 Chronic tinnitus Sanger sequencing -rs34544607 was associated with tinnitus (p = 0.04) but weakened after screening 50 additional cases (p = 0.07) Underpowered, 363 tinnitus cases required No Sand et al., 2012a
-Gene did not predict tinnitus severity
SEROTONIN RECEPTOR/TRANSPORTER
HTR1A 109760 5-hydroxytrypthamine receptor 1A 88 Chronic tinnitus Sanger sequencing -No correlation between tinnitus and rs1800043 polymorphism Not described Not described Kleinjung et al., 2006
SLC6A4 182138 Solute carrier family 6 member 4 54 Chronic tinnitus PCR and VNTR analysis -Association between quality of life scores (severity, p = 0.004; tinnitus discomfort level, p = 0.002; attention deficit, p = 0.04; sleep disorder, p = 0.04) and patients with the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism Not described Not described Deniz et al., 2010

PCR-RFLP: polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism; VNTR: variable number tandem repeat

The study from Pawełczyk et al. also included the analysis of eight further genes involved in the potassium recycling pathway (GJB1, GJB2, GJB3, GJB4, GJB6, KCNJ10, KCNQ1, KCNQ4) but results were not significant (Pawełczyk et al., 2012).