Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2014 Jul 31;55(6):774–781. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.006

Table 2.

Academic rankings for New York City public school students in grades 6–8, by level of fitness change from the previous year, 2006–11

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
N Mean Standard Deviation
(SD)
N Mean (SD) N Mean (SD)
Girls (N=42,718)a
Change in Fitnessb
Substantial Increasec 6089 56.74 27.40 8138 56.96 27.36 6918 56.81 27.50
Moderate Increase 2595 59.01 27.45 5306 59.51 27.49 5304 59.81 27.38
No/small change 6260 59.13 27.92 16081 60.03 27.72 17934 60.66 27.83
Moderate Decrease 2274 56.48 27.88 4942 56.84 27.36 5293 57.24 27.73
Substantial Decrease 4844 54.56 27.81 7724 52.29 27.36 7229 53.02 27.51

Boys (N=40,393)a
Change in Fitnessb
Substantial Increasec 5430 52.37 27.93 7570 53.95 28.37 6936 52.90 28.09
Moderate Increase 2468 54.18 27.75 5074 55.12 28.48 5229 53.37 28.36
No/small change 6387 54.89 28.30 15110 55.13 28.38 16773 54.42 28.69
Moderate Decrease 2228 53.02 28.69 4781 53.16 28.31 4884 52.03 27.90
Substantial Decrease 4393 52.94 28.47 7125 49.42 28.00 6548 48.51 28.30

SD=standard deviation

a

Sum of students does not equal row or column totals because student can appear in each group more than once.

b

T-tests comparing means between boys and girls for each fitness category and grade were significant (all p<0.001).

c

Substantial Increase: >20 percentile point increase, moderate increase: 10–20 percentile point increase, moderate decrease: 10–20 percentile point decrease, substantial decrease: >20 percentile point decrease