Table 3.
Hierarchical Logistic Regression Predicting Runaway Status
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | S.E. | OR (95% CI) | B | S.E. | OR (95% CI) | B | S.E. | OR (95% CI) | |
| Constant | 1.91 | 1.91 | 6.75 | −0.29 | 2.35 | 0.75 | −0.04 | 2.66 | 0.96 |
| Intervention group | 0.43 | 0.68 | 1.53 (0.41–5.79) | 0.38 | 0.72 | 1.46 (0.36–5.99) | 0.11 | 0.79 | 1.11 (0.24–5.24) |
| Parent-rated family functioning | −0.34 | 0.57 | 0.71 (0.23–2.16) | −0.34 | 0.61 | 0.71 (0.21–2.38) | −0.92 | 0.73 | 0.40 (0.10–1.66) |
| Youth-rated family functioning | −0.84 | 0.41 | 0.43 (0.19–0.97)* | −0.61 | 0.45 | 0.54 (0.22–1.32) | −0.23 | 0.52 | 0.79 (0.29–2.20) |
| Problem behaviors | 0.31 | 0.13 | 1.36 (1.05–1.76)* | 0.31 | 0.15 | 1.36 (1.02–1.83)* | |||
| Runaway at baseline | 2.37 | 0.96 | 10.72 (1.65–69.73)* | ||||||
*
p < .05