Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 9;30(3):273–280. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzx015

Table II.

Comparison of kinetic parameters of PpBADH variants and selected other ALDHs

Variant Km (µM) kcat (s−1) kcat/Km (M−1s−1)
PpBADHa,b
 WT 4.4 ± 2.2 156 ± 29 3.5 × 107
 E215D 28 ± 3.9 (6.4) 1.5 ± 0.2 (104) 5.4 × 104 (640)
 E215Q n.a.c n.a. n.a.
 E215L n.a. n.a. n.a.
 E337D 6.6 ± 0.7 (1.5) 45 ± 1 (3.5) 6.8 × 106 (5.1)
 E337Q 20 ± 1.6 (4.5) 0.8 ± 0.1 (195) 4.0 × 104 (875)
 E337L 20 ± 1.5 (4.5) 1.3 ± 0.1 (120) 6.5 × 104 (540)
hALDH2d
 WT 0.5 3.2 6.4 × 106
 E268Q 0.6 (1.2) 6.7 × 10−4 (4800) 6.2 × 102 (10 000)
 E399Q 0.3 (0.6) 0.33 (10) 1.1 × 106 (5.8)
rALDH3e
 WT 0.2 ± 0.02 79 3.9 × 108
 E333Q 4.2 (21) 1.6 (3.0) 3.8 × 105 (1000)
hALDH3f
 WT 220 0.9 4.1 × 103
 E209Q 580 (2.6) 0.8 (0.9) 1.4 × 103 (2.9)
 E333Q n.a. n.a. n.a.

aReactions were carried out in TAPS buffer (0.1 M, pH 8.5) containing 0.1 M KCl, 1 mM NAD+ and 1 mM DTT at 30°C. Data were treated as described in Materials and methods.

bIn parentheses is the fold increase in Km value or decrease in kcat or kcat/Km values.

cn.a. = no enzyme activity detected within the limits of the assay.

dData for reaction of hALDH2 with propionaldehyde from Wang and Weiner (1995) and Sheikh et al. (1997).