Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 21;8(15):24579–24592. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15597

Table 5. Comparison of disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) between AAC vs IDC after breast subtype analyses by univariate cox proportional hazard model.

Subtype DSS OS
Events No./Sum No. HR (95% CI) P-Valuea Events No./Sum No. HR (95% CI) P-Valuea
HR+/HER2-
 AAC 2/51 4.110 (1.026–16.465) 0.046 2/51 2.174 (0.543–8.702) 0.272
 IDC 724/72,454 Reference 1,363/72,454 Reference
HR+/HER2+
 AAC 0/22 0/22
 IDC 129/12,268 Reference 231/12,268 Reference
HR-/HER2+
 AAC 1/42 0.907 (0.127–6.479) 0.923 2/42 1.382 (0.343–5.562) 0.649
 IDC 163/5,472 Reference 213/5,472 Reference
Triple negative
 AAC 2/136 0.203 (0.051–0.812) 0.024 3/136 0.254 (0.082–0.787) 0.018
 IDC 860/13,837 Reference 1,039/13,837 Reference

AAC = apocrine adenocarcinoma, IDC = infiltrating ductal carcinoma, HER2 = human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, HR = hormone receptor, HR = hazard ratio, CI = confidence interval, DSS = disease-specific survival, OS = overall survival.

aP-value was determined by univariate Cox proportional hazard regression model.