Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 27;8(15):25270–25278. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15751

Table 1. Meta-analysis of BCL-2 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk.

No.ofstudies PQ I2 OR 95% CI PZ Model
rs2279115 18(6950/7984)
C vs. A 0.000 74.4% 1.16 1.05,1.29 0.004 Random-effects model
CC+ CA vs. AA 0.000 65.3% 1.19 1.01,1.41 0.039 Random-effects model
CC vs. CA+AA 0.000 67.5% 1.23 1.08,1.41 0.002 Random-effects model
CC vs. CA 0.004 53.8% 1.20 1.07,1.35 0.003 Random-effects model
rs1801018 3(1260/1440)
A vs. G 0.034 70.4% 1.48 0.90,2.44 0.119 Random-effects model
AA+AG vs. GG 0.626 0.00% 1.39 0.66,2.93 0.394 Fixed-effects model
AA vs.AG+GG 0.039 69.1% 1.50 0.90,2.52 0.122 Random-effects model
AA vs. AG 0.057 65.0% 1.46 0.89,2.39 0.134 Random-effects model