Table 1. Meta-analysis of BCL-2 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk.
No.ofstudies | PQ | I2 | OR | 95% CI | PZ | Model | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs2279115 | 18(6950/7984) | ||||||
C vs. A | 0.000 | 74.4% | 1.16 | 1.05,1.29 | 0.004 | Random-effects model | |
CC+ CA vs. AA | 0.000 | 65.3% | 1.19 | 1.01,1.41 | 0.039 | Random-effects model | |
CC vs. CA+AA | 0.000 | 67.5% | 1.23 | 1.08,1.41 | 0.002 | Random-effects model | |
CC vs. CA | 0.004 | 53.8% | 1.20 | 1.07,1.35 | 0.003 | Random-effects model | |
rs1801018 | 3(1260/1440) | ||||||
A vs. G | 0.034 | 70.4% | 1.48 | 0.90,2.44 | 0.119 | Random-effects model | |
AA+AG vs. GG | 0.626 | 0.00% | 1.39 | 0.66,2.93 | 0.394 | Fixed-effects model | |
AA vs.AG+GG | 0.039 | 69.1% | 1.50 | 0.90,2.52 | 0.122 | Random-effects model | |
AA vs. AG | 0.057 | 65.0% | 1.46 | 0.89,2.39 | 0.134 | Random-effects model |