Table 4.

Logistic regression models estimating the relation of baseline characteristics to risk of weight gain over the first year of college (dichotomous outcome defined as gaining >0.5 kg vs. no gain).

Baseline characteristics	Model I, unadjusted*		Model II, sex adjusted†		Model III, fully adjusted§
Anthropometry	Odds ratio	95% CI	Odds ratio	95% CI	Odds ratio	95% CI
BMI (kg/m2)	0.89‡	0.80, 0.99	0.89	0.80, 0.99	0.96	0.75, 1.22
WC (cm)	0.95	0.91, 0.99	0.95	0.90, 0.99	0.88	0.78, 1.00
HC (cm)	0.97	0.92, 1.01	0.97	0.92, 1.01	1.01	0.87, 1.18
Body composition
Total BF (%)	0.95	0.91, 1.0	0.91	0.84, 0.97	0.89	0.80, 1.00
Truncal body fat (%)	0.95	0.91, 1.0	0.93	0.88, 0.98	0.94	0.86, 1.02
FMI (kgadipose/m2)	0.83	0.71, 0.98	0.78	0.65, 0.95	0.79	0.57, 1.09
Energy expenditure
Total PA (MET·hr/d)	1.04	0.99, 1.08	Men: 0.99‡	0.93, 1.05	Men: 0.96‡	0.88, 1.04
			Women: 1.10‡	1.01, 1.19	Women: 1.10‡	1.00, 1.21
Sedentary time (hr/d)	1.07	0.95, 1.21	1.07	0.95, 1.21	1.12	0.95, 1.32

Note.

^*No variables other than the single variable listed were included in unadjusted model.

^†Model was adjusted for sex, and sex by ‘variable’ interaction was tested and included if statistically significant.

^‡The p-value for estimates shown in bold was <0.05; the sex by PA interaction p = 0.0409, thus model estimates shown are sex-specific.

^§Models for anthropometry and body composition variables were adjusted for sex, baseline weight, baseline diet (energy intake, total fat [% energy]), and energy expenditure (PA, sex by PA interaction, and sedentary time).