Skip to main content
. 2017 May 9;8:765. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00765

Table 2.

F-values, coefficients of variations (CV) of statistical analyses, and means with standard deviations (SD) of AB scores and other agronomic assessments for 126 lines of heterogeneous inbred family (HIF) population, HIF-173 evaluated under field conditions in 2015 at Saskatoon and in 2016 at Saskatoon and Rosthern, Saskatchewan.

AB1 (0–9 scale) AB2 (0–9 scale) DTF Plant height (cm) Lodging (1–9 scale) Days to maturity Grain yield (Kg/ha)
Saskatoon Line 1.4 1.5 1.0NS 5.9∗∗∗ 1.3NS 1.3NS 6.5∗∗∗
2015 Range 1–6 2–7 37–41 28–64 2–7 85–92 205–2886
Mean ± SD 3.3 ± 0.7 4.1 ± 1.0 38.4 ± 1.0 54.0 ± 6.6 4.6 ± 0.7 89.3 ± 2.6 980 ± 507
CV (%) 32.6 26.5 2.5 12.2 14.3 2.9 51.7

Saskatoon Line 6.4∗∗∗ 8.6∗∗∗ 1.5 14.7∗∗∗ 3.7∗∗∗ 1.1NS 5.41∗∗∗
2016 Range 2–7 3–8 35–39 29–76 2–6 83–88 95–4126
Mean ± SD 4.5 ± 1.2 5.7 ± 1.3 37.0 ± 1.2 62.4 ± 11.3 3.7 ± 1.1 85.1 ± 1.4 2008 ± 113
CV (%) 26.4 22.3 3.1 18.2 27.5 1.6 38.4

Rosthern Line 4.6∗∗∗ 7.6∗∗∗ 1.0NS 11.3∗∗∗ 1.5∗∗ 1.4 3.3∗∗∗
2016 Range 3–7 4–9 37–42 27–74 1–6 90–95 40–4858
Mean ± SD 4.9 ± 1.1 6.6 ± 1.3 39.9 ± 1.2 55.3 ± 13.4 3.2 ± 0.8 92.6 ± 1.3 1602 ± 104
CV (%) 20.4 19.2 2.7 24.3 25.1 1.4 44.3

NS- not significant; P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; AB1 and AB2 denote AB scores at pod filling and physiological maturity stages, respectively.