Skip to main content
. 2017 May 2;11:817–827. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S130706

Table 3.

Categorical analysis

Outcome measure Normality criterion Sites N BL, n (%) FU1, n (%) FU2, n (%) FU3, n (%)
TBUT (s) >10 1 38 1 (2.6) 11 (29) 15 (39) 20 (53)
2 42 15 (36) 39 (93) 40 (95) 42 (100)
SPEED <10 1+2 80 18 (22) 65 (81) 61 (76) 67 (84)
MGS ≤10 1+2 80 7 (8.8) 24 (30) 31 (39) 28 (35)
CFS <10 1 38 24 (63) 38 (100) 34 (89) 36 (95)
2 42 42 (100) 40 (95) 42 (100) 42 (100)
TFO (mOsm/L) <310 1+2 20 0 (0) 17 (85) 17 (85) 17 (85)
ΔTFO (mOsm/L) <8 1+2 24 0 (0) 13 (54) 14 (58) 16 (67)
LLT (nm) <60 1 38 29 (76) 31 (82) 31 (76) 28 (74)

Notes: In this analysis, outcome measures were dichotomized to “normal” or “consistent with DED”, according to the criteria listed under the column “Normality criterion”. n, number of eyes with normal values.

Abbreviations: BL, baseline; CFS, corneal fluorescein staining; DED, dry eye disease; FU, follow-up; LLT, lipid layer thickness; MGS, meibomian gland score; SPEED, Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness; TBUT, tear breakup time; TFO, tear film osmolarity.