Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 17;114(18):E3719–E3728. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617721114

Table S1.

Statistical analysis of data in Fig. 2

Pair Effect size 95% CI P value
a 102.08 32.65, 171.52 0.0049
b 116.63 72.29, 160.96 9.61E-6
c 14.54 −58.33, 87.42 0.6987
d 23.49 3.51, 43.46 0.0221
e 58.30 22.47, 94.13 0.0031
f 34.82 −2.78, 72.42 0.0679
g 102.70 28.19, 177.21 0.0083
h 76.84 9.69, 143.99 0.0271
i −25.86 −117.00, 65.28 0.5698
j 26.65 7.22, 46.08 0.0085
k 57.28 25.24, 89.32 0.0016
l 30.63; −4.37, 65.52 0.0835
m 2.82 1.74, 3.90 0.0001
n 8.31 6.77, 9.86 8.56E-7
o 1.30 0.08, 2.51 0.0369
p 4.93 2.71, 7.15 0.0002
q 1.86 0.71, 3.02 0.0032
r 3.12 1.01, 5.25 0.008
s −2.34 −3.87, −0.80 0.0044
t −2.10 −3.91, −0.30 0.0239
u −2.46 −4.20, −0.71 0.0082

Bolded letters denote pairs showing reproducible differences; italicized letters denote pairs with no discernible differences.