Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 17;114(18):E3719–E3728. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617721114

Table S4.

Statistical analysis of data in Fig. 5

Pair Effect size 95% CI P value
a −122.17 −196.39, −47.95 0.0019
b −31.93 −50.39, −13.48 0.0013
c 5.63 2.57, 8.69 7.72E-4
d −0.22 −1.75, 1.31 0.7719
e −5.85 −8.81, −2.89 0.0004
f 4.47 2.72, 6.21 7.97E-6
g 1.13 −0.73, 2.99 0.2279
h −3.34 −5.47, −1.21 0.0029
i 9.31; 6.07, 12.55 1.95E-6
j −0.01 −1.74, 1.73 0.9958
k -9.34; −12.41, −6.22 1.52E-6
l 6.42 3.39, 9.45 0.0001
m 0.32 −1.98, 2.62 0.7797
n −6.10; −9.10, −3.10 0.0002
o −0.38 −0.47, −0.29 1.16E-16
p 0.29 0.13, 0.41 1.26E-6
q 0.17 0.05, 0.31 0.007

Bolded letters denote pairs showing reproducible differences; italicized letters denote pairs with no discernible differences.