Table 1.
Expression analysis of SNHG16 and snoRNAs in paired samples.a
| Gene name | Gene id | Pairs with FC(log2) >1.0 (%) | Pairs with FC(log2) < −1.0 (%) | Pairs with −1.0 < FC(log2) < 1.0 (%) | Total number of pairs | FC(log2) all samples | Corrected p‐valueb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNHG16 | ENSG00000163597.9 | 208 (72) | 0 (0) | 82 (28) | 290 | 1.24 | <0.001 |
| snoRD1A | ENST00000364968.1 | 40 (55) | 5 (7) | 28 (38) | 73 | 1.13 | <0.001 |
| snoRD1B | ENSG00000199961.1 | 14 (14) | 28 (28) | 57 (58) | 99 | −0.34 | 0.006 |
| snoRD1C | ENSG00000200185.1 | 25 (30) | 10 (12) | 47 (57) | 82 | 0.57 | <0.001 |
a
SNHG16 was measured in the largeRNAseq cohort, and the snoRNAs in the smallRNAseq cohort. Only pairs with expression of the respective genes in both the normal and the paired tumor sample were included in the analysis.
b
Student's paired t‐test. Bonferroni corrected p‐values.