Table 1.
Predicted concentrations of CBZ using multiway algorithms on two different serum samples spiked with different amount of analytes
| Sample | CBZ concentrations (μg mL−1)a |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum 1 | Taken |
ATLD |
SWATLD |
APTLD |
PARAFAC |
U-PLS/RBL |
| Unspiked | - | n.db | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d |
| s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 |
0.48 0.95 7.60 5.45 2.35 |
0.39(80.4%) 0.74(78.4%) 6.78(89.3%) 5.03(93.3%) 2.23(95.1%) [6.71]c |
0.63(133.0%) 0.95(99.7%) 6.23 (82.0%) 4.88(89.5%) 2.17(92.4%) [5.24] |
0.63(133.0%) 0.95(99.7%) 6.23 (82.0%) 4.88(89.5%) 2.17(92.4%) [5.24] |
0.37(78.0%) 0.75(79.2%) 6.91 (91.0%) 5.02(92.2%) 2.34(99.7%) [5.60] |
0.38(80.4%) 0.61 (64.0%) 6.04(79.4%) 3.78 (69.3%) 1.72 (73.0%) [6.22] |
| Serum 2 | ||||||
| Unspiked | - | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. |
| s6 s7 s8 s9 s10 s11 s12 |
0.85 8.15 4.12 6.45 3.20 0.50 1.80 |
0.92(108.2%) 6.52 (80.0%) 4.93(119.6%) 5.33 (82.6%) 2.99 (93.4%) 0.47 (94.0%) 1.79 (99.8%) [12.53]c |
0.92(108.2%) 6.79 (83.3%) 4.33(105.1%) 5.35 (82.9%) 3.03 (94.7%) 0.50 (100.0%) 1.79 (99.80%) [9.23] |
0.92(108.2%) 6.79 (83.3%) 4.33(105.1%) 5.34 (82.8%) 3.03 (94.7%) 0.41 (82.0%) 1.79 (99.8%) [6.68] |
0.93(109.4%) 7.37 (90.4%) 3.07 (74.5%) 5.65 (87.6%) 3.11 (97.2%) 0.62 (124.0%) 1.79 (99.8%) [2.82] |
0.96(113.3%) 7.23(88.7%) 3.51(85.2%) 5.51(85.4%) 3.06(95.6%) 0.53(105.3%) 1.69(93.6%) [6.85] |
a
Recoveries in parenthesis.
b
Not detected.
c
RSD (%) for three replicates of s5 and s12 in square brackets.