Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 7;7(1):18–32. doi: 10.1159/000458712

Table 2.

Change in CKD prevalence in local QI, non-QI, and national comparators using PfP data

Estimated CKD prevalence1, % Target prevalence2, % % of target prevalence achieved Change in CKD prevalence (% of 18+ years practice list) Absolute change, % points Relative increase, %
Project 1 (PfP non-QI and national data from March 2009 and March 2011)
Local QI practices (n = 19) 6.4 5.1 92 3.6→5.0 1.4 38
Local non-QI practices (n = 208) N/A N/A N/A 37→4.5 0.8 22
National primary care (n = 8,229) N/A N/A N/A 4.1→4.3 0.2 5

Project 2 (PfP non-QI and national data from March 2011 and March 2012)
Local QI practices (n = 11) 6.1 5.3 154 4.6→5.8 1.2 26
Local non-QI practices (n = 105) N/A N/A N/A 4.4→4.6 0.2 5
National primary care (n = 8,245) N/A N/A N/A 4.3→4.3 0 0

Project 3 (PfP non-QI and national data from March 2012 and March 2014)
Local QI practices (n = 12) 6.2 5.7 161 5.2→6.0 0.8 15
Local non-QI practices (n = 53) N/A N/A N/A 5.5→5.3 –0.2 –4
National primary care (n = 8,123) N/A N/A N/A 4.3→4.0 –0.3 –7

Project 4 (PfP non-QI and national data from March 2013 and March 2014)
Local QI practices (n = 7) 2.1 1.8 147 1.5→2.0 0.5 33
Local non-QI practices (n = 30) N/A N/A N/A 2.3→2.3 0 0
National primary care (n = 8,020) N/A N/A N/A 4.3→4.0 –0.3 –7

N/A, not applicable.

1

Based on practice age/sex data taken at baseline.

2

Objective 1: 50% improvement in undiagnosed CKD.