Skip to main content
. 2017 May 9;17:340. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2207-2

Table 4.

Examples of types and sources of evaluation data used by committees

Process (implementation) and Impact (practice change)
▪ Progress Reports for new TCPs including number of patients treated, number waiting, new referrals (6 monthly)
▪ Medication safety audits (twice yearly)
▪ Continual Review Evaluation through Australian Council of Healthcare Standards Guide (dates in Nursing Strategic Plan)
▪ Established surveillance mechanisms of transfusion practices (ongoing)
▪ Audits of transfusion practice (random, on behalf of Department of Human Services)
▪ Incident reports (as they arise, documented in Riskman software)
Practitioner outcomes
▪ Survey/interview data including user satisfaction and comments (after project implementation)
▪ Clinical practice audits (quarterly)
▪ Incident reports (as they arise, documented in Riskman software)
Patient outcomes
▪ Progress Reports for new TCPs including patient outcomes and adverse events (6 monthly)
▪ Reports of adverse events related to new TCPs (at the time of occurrence)
▪ Infection Control surveillance mechanisms (ongoing)
▪ Incident reports (as they arise, documented in Riskman software)
Economic outcomes
▪ Clinical Information Management databases of routinely-collected data used to assess
 − Cost of falls and falls-related injuries (as required)
 − Cost of increased length of stay (as required)
 − Costs of products (as required)
 − Costs of procedures (as required)
System outcomes
▪ Applications for new TCPs including anticipated implications of new TCP on other areas such as intensive care or pharmacy
▪ Reports of 2 year review after introduction of new TCP including actual implications of new TCP on other areas