Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 9.
Published in final edited form as: Langmuir. 2017 Mar 2;33(10):2523–2530. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04581

Table 1.

Potentials (versus NHE) of SQWV reductive sweeps for WT and mutant EndoIII and WT MutY in the presence and absence of DNA.

a Enzyme b ESQWV (mV), − DNA b ESQWV (mV), + DNA
WT EndoIII 130 ± 8 c 64 ± 8
WT EndoIII + poly-L glutamate 110 ± 9 -
EndoIII E200K 130 ± 7 -
EndoIII Y205H 125 ± 11 -
EndoIII K208E 141 ± 12 -
WT MutY d > 130 mV c 85 ± 3
c, e 80 ± 6
a

When used, CNTs were added from a 0.25 mg/mL stock, and all experiments used protein storage buffer as the supporting electrolyte (20 mM sodium phosphate, 0.5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5 for EndoIII, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.6 for MutY).

b

Each value is the average of 3 or more separate experiments, and error is standard deviation of the mean.

c

No CNTs present.

d

The MutY SQWV peaks (Figure 2) were too small and noisy to measure the potential with confidence.

e

OG:FA MutY substrate trap DNA