Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Carcinog. 2017 Feb 23;56(6):1663–1672. doi: 10.1002/mc.22622

Table 1.

Associations between SNPs in the fatty acid pathways and NSCLC risk with FDR-P<0.05

SNP Gene Chr Position Allele* TRICL
Harvard
EAF Q I2 Effects OR (95%CI) P FDR EAF OR (95%CI) P
rs1800628 TNF 6 31546850 G/A 0.11 0.541 0 ++++++ 1.18 (1.11–1.24) 5.46×10−9 0.0002 0.09 1.14 (0.99–1.32) 0.071
rs4646521 CYP4F3 19 15769872 G/T 0.35 0.672 0 ++++++ 1.09 (1.05–1.13) 3.83×10−6 0.018 0.37 0.99 (0.91–1.07) 0.774
rs10405638 CYP4F3 19 15764870 C/T 0.36 0.478 0 ++++-+ 1.09 (1.05–1.12) 7.59×10−6 0.018 0.38 0.99 (0.92–1.08) 0.888
rs4646904§ CYP4F3 19 15763721 G/A 0.36 0.488 0 ++++-+ 1.09 (1.05–1.13) 8.65×10−6 0.018 0.37 0.99 (0.92–1.08) 0.884
rs2102959 CYP4F3 19 15767392 A/G 0.36 0.573 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.05–1.12) 1.07×10−5 0.018 0.38 0.99 (0.91–1.07) 0.779
rs10401516 CYP4F3 19 15760577 C/T 0.36 0.552 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.05–1.12) 1.17×10−5 0.018 0.38 0.99 (0.92–1.08) 0.895
rs4646514 CYP4F3 19 15769270 A/C 0.36 0.562 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.27×10−5 0.018 0.38 0.98 (0.90–1.06) 0.633
rs4646515 CYP4F3 19 15769379 G/C 0.36 0.562 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.27×10−5 0.018 0.38 0.98 (0.90–1.06) 0.615
rs718258 CYP4F3 19 15766419 G/A 0.36 0.564 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.28×10−5 0.018 0.38 0.99 (0.91–1.07) 0.807
rs4646520 CYP4F3 19 15769775 A/G 0.36 0.558 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.33×10−5 0.018 0.38 0.98 (0.90–1.06) 0.599
rs10404163 CYP4F3 19 15769805 A/T 0.36 0.558 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.33×10−5 0.018 0.38 0.98 (0.90–1.06) 0.599
rs4646513 CYP4F3 19 15769253 C/A 0.36 0.561 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.34×10−5 0.018 0.38 0.98 (0.90–1.06) 0.639
rs2073600 CYP4F3 19 15757643 C/T 0.36 0.475 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.51×10−5 0.018 0.37 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.983
rs2072598 CYP4F3 19 15757528 A/G 0.36 0.472 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.53×10−5 0.018 0.37 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.990
rs2280750 CYP4F3 19 15757428 T/A 0.36 0.473 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.54×10−5 0.018 0.37 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.992
rs2283611 CYP4F3 19 15759828 A/G 0.36 0.461 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.54×10−5 0.018 0.37 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.990
rs2283609 CYP4F3 19 15759764 C/T 0.36 0.462 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.54×10−5 0.018 0.37 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.990
rs2077040 CYP4F3 19 15755840 T/C 0.36 0.474 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.55×10−5 0.018 0.37 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.990
rs2077080 CYP4F3 19 15755392 G/C 0.36 0.474 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.55×10−5 0.018 0.37 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.990
rs4808346 CYP4F3 19 15758931 T/C 0.36 0.462 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.55×10−5 0.018 0.37 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.990
rs8107976 CYP4F3 19 15753683 A/G 0.36 0.481 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.55×10−5 0.018 0.37 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.988
rs2203998 CYP4F3 19 15754893 A/G 0.36 0.477 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.56×10−5 0.018 0.37 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.990
rs8106799 CYP4F3 19 15753759 G/A 0.36 0.48 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.56×10−5 0.018 0.37 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.990
rs2204000 CYP4F3 19 15755112 G/A 0.36 0.479 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.56×10−5 0.018 0.37 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.986
rs2203999 CYP4F3 19 15754975 C/T 0.36 0.479 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.56×10−5 0.018 0.37 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.986
rs4646512 CYP4F3 19 15764220 C/T 0.36 0.454 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.58×10−5 0.018 0.38 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.948
rs116260720 GPX5 6 28502794 C/A 0.22 0.335 12.5 +++++- 1.10 (1.05–1.14) 1.65×10−5 0.018 0.21 1.11 (1.00–1.22) 0.043
rs4646516 CYP4F3 19 15769449 A/G 0.36 0.568 0 ++++-+ 1.08 (1.04–1.12) 1.67×10−5 0.018 0.38 0.98 (0.90–1.06) 0.639

NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; EAF, effect allele frequency; FDR, false discovery rate; TRICL, Transdisciplinary Research in Cancer of the Lung;

*

reference allele / effect allele;

fixed effect models were used when no heterogeneity was found between studies (Q>0.10 and I2 <25.0%); otherwise, random effect models were used;

means positive association, and-means negative association;

§

online function prediction tool, SNPinfo [25], found that rs4646904 might influence splicing efficiency of CYP4F3;

SNPs in bold were putative functional and were not located in the major histocompatibility complex region.