Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Nov 21;13(4):669–673. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.016

Table 1.

Patient descriptives, body weight, body composition, and resting metabolic rate before and six months after LRYGB and LAGB

All Participants LRYGB LAGB
Baseline 6 Months Baseline 6 Months Baseline 6 Months
N (females) 13 (10) -- 8 (6) -- 5 (4) --
Age (y) 46.2 (12.7) -- 46.6 (10.2) -- 45.4 (17.3) --
BMI (kg/m2) 46.4 (5.8) 36.8 (6.1) a 47.1 (6.8) 34.1 (5.6) a 45.3 (4.2) 41.2 (4.3) a b
Body weight (kg) 128.5 (14.6) 101.9 (15.5) a 131.7 (15.9) 95.4 (13.1) a 123.5 (11.9) 112.4 (14.1) a b
Lean body mass (kg) 69.9 (12.1) 61.0 (11.8) a 71.8 (14.1) 60.2 (13.3) a 66.9 (8.6) 62.4 (10.1) a b
Fat mass (kg) 58.6 (8.9) 40.9 (11.6) a 59.9 (9.7) 35.2 (9.6) a 56.6 (7.9) 50.0 (8.3) a b
Body fat percentage (%) 46.6 (5.5) 40.1 (8.1) a 46.5 (6.0) 37.6 (8.9) a 46.7 (5.1) 44.1 (5.2) b
RMR (kcal/d) 1982 (222) 1767 (240) a 2029 (26.1) 1759 (287) a 1907 (13.2) 1779 (170)
RMRpredicted (kcal/d) 1982 (196) 1792 (181) a 2009 (217) 1755 (193) a 1938 (172) 1851 (161) a, b
RMRmeasured-predicted 0 (104) −25 (114) 19 (99) 4 (128) −31 (116) −73 (75)

LRYGB, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; LAGB, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding; BMI, body mass index; RMR, resting metabolic rate; RMRpredicted, resting metabolic rate predicted from the equation: RMR (kcal/d) = 1006.775 + 13.614*LBM + 3.888*FM – 5.490*age – 27.569*sex; RMRmeasured-predicted, difference between measured and predicted RMR at each time point

a

significantly different from before surgery

b

change from before surgery was significantly different from LRYGB