Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;8:297. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00297

Table 1.

Studies reporting a change in muscle adaption with unilateral training.

References Muscle thickness assessment Muscle Intervention in the non-training limb Effect of training on contralateral muscle size Effect of no training on contralateral muscle size Variability
Brown et al., 1990 Computerized tomography scans Elbow flexors (biceps brachii and brachialis) N/A No change N/A N/A
Bezerra et al., 2009 MRI Quadriceps N/A No change No change ICC = 0.99
Farthing et al., 2009 B-Mode ultrasound (SSD-500; Aloka) Posterior medial forearm (flexor carpi ulnaris and flexor digitorum superficialis) Immobilization −1.1% (NS) −4.3% (*) CV = 1.4–1.5%
Magnus et al., 2010 B-Mode ultrasound (SSD-500; Aloka) Biceps brachii Immobilization 2.2% −2.8% (*) CV = 1.4–1.5%
Magnus et al., 2010 B-Mode ultrasound (SSD-500; Aloka) Triceps brachii Immobilization 3.4% −5.2% (*) CV = 1.4–1.5%
Farthing et al., 2011 B-Mode ultrasound (SSD-500; Aloka) Posterior medial forearm (flexor carpi ulnaris and flexor digitorum superficialis) Immobilization −4.72% (NS) −1.66% (NS) CV = 1.4–1.5%
Pearce et al., 2013 Nemio20 premium compact ultrasound (Toshiba) Elbow flexors (biceps brachii and brachialis) Immobilization 0% (NS) −6% (*) CV = 2.4%
Magnus et al., 2014 Portable ultrasound scanner (LOGIQ e BTO8, GE Healthcare) Supraspinatus N/A −0.5% (NS) +0.5% (NS) CV = 3.7%
Magnus et al., 2014 Portable ultrasound scanner (LOGIQ e BTO8, GE Healthcare) Anterior deltoid N/A +5.1% (NS) −7.35% (NS) CV = 3.7%

ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; CV, coefficient of variation; NS, non-significant when compared to baseline;

*

significantly different from baseline, p < 0.05