Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 1;41(1):34–48. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuw037

Table 1.

Pros and cons of five markers of artemisinin resistance.

Therapeutic efficacy of ACT Proportion of cases microscopy positive at day 3 Parasite clearance half-life Ring-stage survival assay (RSA) K13 sequencing
Influence on antimalarial policy Direct Indirect Indirect Indirect Indirect
Confounded by partner drug Yes Yes In theorya No No
Confounded by starting parasitaemia Yes Yes Slightlyb No No
Level of assessment Population Population Individual Individual Individual
Convenient for patient Requires at least 42 days follow-up Minimal follow-up required Requires frequent sampling for 2–3 days Yes Yes
Specific resources required PCR differentiation for recurrences None Inpatient stay, accurate parasite quantification Expertise, culture facilities Access to sequencing

aNo direct evidence, but theoretically possible given the influence of partner drug on day 3 positivity (Stepniewska et al.2010).

bIn areas of artemisinin resistance, high parasitaemias were associated with slightly longer PC1/2 (by 5.2% per 10-fold increase) (WWARN Parasite Clearance Study Group 2015).