Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 23;6(3):159–171. doi: 10.1530/EC-16-0110

Table 2.

P values testing Hardy–Weinberg proportion and test for heterogeneity of studies included in the meta-analysis for ApaI AA polymorphism respectively.

Study Intervention Controls Odds ratio 95% CI z P
T J Chang 2000 16/157 13/248 2.051 0.958–4.391
Balazs Gyorffy 2002 33/107 23/103 1.551 0.835–2.881
Vaselin Scrabic 2003 66/134 51/132 1.542 0.947–2.509
J J San Pedro 2005 15/71 28/88 0.574 0.278–1.185
Diego Garcia 2007 54/216 43/203 1.240 0.786–1.957
C Panierakis 2009 23/100 37/96 0.476 0.256–0.886
Greear R M 2013 15/55 12/50 1.187 0.493–2.861
Chung Cheon 2015 5/81 9/113 0.760 0.245–2.359
Total (fixed effects) 227/921 216/1033 1.113 0.893–1.388 0.954 0.340
Total (random effects) 227/921 216/1033 1.081 0.755–1.547 0.425 0.671
Q 16.3471
DF 7
Significance level P = 0.0221
I2 (inconsistency) 57.18%
95% CI for I2 5.93–80.51

Bias indicators: Begg–Mazumdar: Kendall’s Tau = −0.142857 P = 0.5484 (low power); Egger: bias = −1.369742 (95% CI = −6.646958 to 3.907474) P = 0.5488; Harbord–Egger: bias = −1.179831 (92.5% CI = −5.949539 to 3.589877) P = 0.6138.

DF, degree of freedom; Q, heterogeneity in meta analysis.