Table 2.
P values testing Hardy–Weinberg proportion and test for heterogeneity of studies included in the meta-analysis for ApaI AA polymorphism respectively.
Study | Intervention | Controls | Odds ratio | 95% CI | z | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T J Chang 2000 | 16/157 | 13/248 | 2.051 | 0.958–4.391 | ||
Balazs Gyorffy 2002 | 33/107 | 23/103 | 1.551 | 0.835–2.881 | ||
Vaselin Scrabic 2003 | 66/134 | 51/132 | 1.542 | 0.947–2.509 | ||
J J San Pedro 2005 | 15/71 | 28/88 | 0.574 | 0.278–1.185 | ||
Diego Garcia 2007 | 54/216 | 43/203 | 1.240 | 0.786–1.957 | ||
C Panierakis 2009 | 23/100 | 37/96 | 0.476 | 0.256–0.886 | ||
Greear R M 2013 | 15/55 | 12/50 | 1.187 | 0.493–2.861 | ||
Chung Cheon 2015 | 5/81 | 9/113 | 0.760 | 0.245–2.359 | ||
Total (fixed effects) | 227/921 | 216/1033 | 1.113 | 0.893–1.388 | 0.954 | 0.340 |
Total (random effects) | 227/921 | 216/1033 | 1.081 | 0.755–1.547 | 0.425 | 0.671 |
Q | 16.3471 | |||||
DF | 7 | |||||
Significance level | P = 0.0221 | |||||
I2 (inconsistency) | 57.18% | |||||
95% CI for I2 | 5.93–80.51 |
Bias indicators: Begg–Mazumdar: Kendall’s Tau = −0.142857 P = 0.5484 (low power); Egger: bias = −1.369742 (95% CI = −6.646958 to 3.907474) P = 0.5488; Harbord–Egger: bias = −1.179831 (92.5% CI = −5.949539 to 3.589877) P = 0.6138.
DF, degree of freedom; Q, heterogeneity in meta analysis.