Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 23;6(3):159–171. doi: 10.1530/EC-16-0110

Table 3.

P values testing Hardy–Weinberg proportion and test for heterogeneity of studies included in the meta-analysis for ApaI Aa polymorphism respectively.

Study Intervention Controls Odds ratio 95% CI z P
T J Chang 2000 76/157 105/248 1.278 0.855–1.910
Balazs Gyorffy 2002 45/107 54/103 0.659 0.382–1.136
Vaselin Scrabic 2003 52/134 66/132 0.634 0.390–1.032
J J San Pedro 2005 37/71 43/88 1.139 0.609–2.129
Diego Garcia 2007 115/216 125/203 0.710 0.481–1.048
C Panierakis 2009 58/100 57/96 0.945 0.535–1.669
Greear R M 2013 24/55 32/50 0.435 0.198–0.956
Chung Cheon 2015 32/81 34/113 1.517 0.833–2.765
Total (fixed effects) 439/921 516/1033 0.873 0.729–1.046 −1.473 0.141
Total (random effects) 439/921 516/1033 0.866 0.664–1.131 −1.054 0.292
Q 14.2512
DF 7
Significance level P = 0.0469
I2 (inconsistency) 50.88%
95% CI for I2 0.00–78.02

Bias indicators: Begg–Mazumdar: Kendall’s Tau = 0 P = 0.9049 (low power); Egger: bias = −0.928241 (95% CI = −7.113964 to 5.257482) P = 0.7261; Harbord–Egger: bias = −0.806491 (92.5% CI = −6.321591 to 4.708608) P = 0.7638.

DF, degree of freedom; Q, heterogeneity in meta analysis.