Table 3.
P values testing Hardy–Weinberg proportion and test for heterogeneity of studies included in the meta-analysis for ApaI Aa polymorphism respectively.
Study | Intervention | Controls | Odds ratio | 95% CI | z | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T J Chang 2000 | 76/157 | 105/248 | 1.278 | 0.855–1.910 | ||
Balazs Gyorffy 2002 | 45/107 | 54/103 | 0.659 | 0.382–1.136 | ||
Vaselin Scrabic 2003 | 52/134 | 66/132 | 0.634 | 0.390–1.032 | ||
J J San Pedro 2005 | 37/71 | 43/88 | 1.139 | 0.609–2.129 | ||
Diego Garcia 2007 | 115/216 | 125/203 | 0.710 | 0.481–1.048 | ||
C Panierakis 2009 | 58/100 | 57/96 | 0.945 | 0.535–1.669 | ||
Greear R M 2013 | 24/55 | 32/50 | 0.435 | 0.198–0.956 | ||
Chung Cheon 2015 | 32/81 | 34/113 | 1.517 | 0.833–2.765 | ||
Total (fixed effects) | 439/921 | 516/1033 | 0.873 | 0.729–1.046 | −1.473 | 0.141 |
Total (random effects) | 439/921 | 516/1033 | 0.866 | 0.664–1.131 | −1.054 | 0.292 |
Q | 14.2512 | |||||
DF | 7 | |||||
Significance level | P = 0.0469 | |||||
I2 (inconsistency) | 50.88% | |||||
95% CI for I2 | 0.00–78.02 |
Bias indicators: Begg–Mazumdar: Kendall’s Tau = 0 P = 0.9049 (low power); Egger: bias = −0.928241 (95% CI = −7.113964 to 5.257482) P = 0.7261; Harbord–Egger: bias = −0.806491 (92.5% CI = −6.321591 to 4.708608) P = 0.7638.
DF, degree of freedom; Q, heterogeneity in meta analysis.