Table 8.
P values testing Hardy–Weinberg proportion and test for heterogeneity of studies included in the meta-analysis for FokI FF polymorphism respectively.
Study | Intervention | Controls | Odds ratio | 95% CI | z | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balazs Gyorffy 2002 | 36/107 | 29/103 | 1.294 | 0.719–2.328 | ||
Tatijana Semunik 2005 | 42/132 | 73/232 | 1.016 | 0.642–1.609 | ||
J J San Pedro 2005 | 31/71 | 41/88 | 0.888 | 0.474–1.666 | ||
C Panierakis 2009 | 64/100 | 50/96 | 1.636 | 0.923–2.898 | ||
Greear R M 2013 | 21/55 | 28/50 | 0.485 | 0.223–1.058 | ||
Total (fixed effects) | 194/465 | 221/569 | 1.057 | 0.817–1.367 | 0.420 | 0.675 |
Total (random effects) | 194/465 | 221/569 | 1.036 | 0.733–1.465 | 0.202 | 0.840 |
Q | 6.8448 | |||||
DF | 4 | |||||
Significance level | P = 0.1443 | |||||
I2 (inconsistency) | 41.56% | |||||
95% CI for I2 | 0.00–78.48 |
Bias indicators: Begg–Mazumdar: Kendall’s Tau = −0.6 P = 0.00833 (low power); Egger: bias = −3.653382 (95% CI = −14.60785 to 7.301086) P = 0.3664; Harbord–Egger: bias = −3.796013 (92.5% CI = −13.262673 to 5.670648) P = 0.3612.
DF, degree of freedom; Q, heterogeneity in meta analysis.