Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 23;6(3):159–171. doi: 10.1530/EC-16-0110

Table 8.

P values testing Hardy–Weinberg proportion and test for heterogeneity of studies included in the meta-analysis for FokI FF polymorphism respectively.

Study Intervention Controls Odds ratio 95% CI z P
Balazs Gyorffy 2002 36/107 29/103 1.294 0.719–2.328
Tatijana Semunik 2005 42/132 73/232 1.016 0.642–1.609
J J San Pedro 2005 31/71 41/88 0.888 0.474–1.666
C Panierakis 2009 64/100 50/96 1.636 0.923–2.898
Greear R M 2013 21/55 28/50 0.485 0.223–1.058
Total (fixed effects) 194/465 221/569 1.057 0.817–1.367 0.420 0.675
Total (random effects) 194/465 221/569 1.036 0.733–1.465 0.202 0.840
Q 6.8448
DF 4
Significance level P = 0.1443
I2 (inconsistency) 41.56%
95% CI for I2 0.00–78.48

Bias indicators: Begg–Mazumdar: Kendall’s Tau = −0.6 P = 0.00833 (low power); Egger: bias = −3.653382 (95% CI = −14.60785 to 7.301086) P = 0.3664; Harbord–Egger: bias = −3.796013 (92.5% CI = −13.262673 to 5.670648) P = 0.3612.

DF, degree of freedom; Q, heterogeneity in meta analysis.